Skip to content

· Public charity

The Texas Area Fund Foundation Inc

Fund raising for community projects - to advance community economic and public facility development, as well as to fund projects that are charitable and educational in nature.

$127k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Youth Development$145kPhilanthropy$122kHuman Services$68kArts & Culture$56kEducation$30kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$16kHealth$5k
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $87,005, the rows itemized in this filing. The $127,191 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,186 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACTION FUND OF ANDERSON COUNTY TEXAS$51,790
HOPE STATION$16,000
BOY SCOUT TROOP 440$10,000
PALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATER$9,215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ANDERSON COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD: $60k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 5 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -15% since the first grant, against -46% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$227k
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
-46%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Youth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • TS
    TEXAS STATE RAILROAD SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $32k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • RD
    Rotary District 5910 Charitable Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue -51% · 32% of their budget
  • AC
    ANDERSON COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • TY
    TEXAS YOUTH ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eagle Peak Alliance

Eagle Peak Alliance charters local Cub Scout Packs and Boy Scout Troops serving over 200 youth with the Scouting America character and leadership development programs.

Youth Development
2
World of Scouting Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Friends of Coppell Scouting

Charter Scouting America Circle Ten Troops 842 and 848 and support Scouting in Coppell TX and surrounding areas

Youth Development
4
Rotary International District 6840
—
5
Troop 491 Montgomery

Provides a program for young people that builds character, trains them in responsibilities of participating citizenship, develops leadership skills and personal fitness.

Youth Development
6
Pta Texas Congress

Child Advocacy

—
7
Boy Scouts of America Troop 14

To provide a boy scout program for the youth teaching leadership skills, outdoor skills and provide monthly and summer outdoor experiences.

Youth Development
8
Pta Texas Congress

Educational/Charitable

—
9
Boy Scouts of America Pack 3300 Inc

The troop plans trips that teach the scouts to be leaders, good citizens, and teaches educational skills such as outdoor survival techniques

—
10
Texas Childrens Museum

Education

Arts & Culture
11
Parker County Fine Arts Association

Presentation of Theatrical Productions

Arts & Culture
12
Fairfield Police Explorers

Boy scouts of america explorer post

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boy Scouts of America; the most unlike its peers is Rotary District 5910 Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACTION FUND OF ANDERSON COUNTY TEXAS: $51,790 · OtherACTION FUND OF ANDERSON COUNTY TEXASTEXAS STATE RAILROAD SOCIETY: $40,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE RAILROAD SOCIETYBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL: $32,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCI…First Presby Church-Palestine: $25,000 · OtherFirst Presby Church-PalestineHOPE STATION: $16,000 · OtherHOPE STATIONMONTALBA COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $7,225 · OtherMUSEUM FOR EAST TEXAS CULTURE: $6,350 · Other+1 more: $5,100 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICARotary District 5910 Charitable Foundation: $70,000 · PhilanthropyRotary District 5…ANDERSON COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC: $60,327 · Human ServicesANDERSON COUNT…ICEE Success Foundation: $30,000 · EducationTEXAS YOUTH ADVOCATES: $13,390 · Recreation & SportsPALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $9,215 · Arts & Culture
Other$183,465Youth Development$100,000Philanthropy$70,000Human Services$60,327Education$30,000Recreation & Sports$13,390Arts & Culture$9,215

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRotary District 5910 Charitable Foundation: $70,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL: $32,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetICEE Success Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTEXAS YOUTH ADVOCATES: $13,390 over 1y, 24% of budgetPALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $9,215 over 1y, 11% of budgetMUSEUM FOR EAST TEXAS CULTURE: $6,350 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Texas Area Fund Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Texas Area Fund Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Texas Area Fund Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Texas Area Fund Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texas Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph