Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Susan Oman Belsky Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Animals$214kHuman Services$34kEnvironment$12k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$15,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$13,000
LOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,350
ASPCA$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL$7,500
PET PARTNERS$5,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION$2,500
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$2,500
PET ORPHANS OF SOUTHERN CALIF$500
AMANDA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 11%LOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS: $21k → 14%ASPCA: $10k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $37k → 12%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%PET PARTNERS: $5k → 9%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 11%LOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS: $10k → 14%ASPCA: $10k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 14%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $13k → 12%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%PET PARTNERS: $5k → 9%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 11%LOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS: $8k → 14%ASPCA: $6k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 14%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10k → 12%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PET PARTNERS: $3k → 9%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 11%LOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 14%ASPCA: $4k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10k → 12%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PET PARTNERS: $2k → 9%AMANDA FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $4k → 14%AMANDA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $3k → 14%AMANDA FOUNDATION: $450 → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $3k → 14%AMANDA FOUNDATION: $400 → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $3k → 14%PET ORPHANS OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $500 → 14%PET ORPHANS OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $500 → 14%PET ORPHANS OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $450 → 14%PET ORPHANS OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$260k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$260k
$0

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +18%
  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +34%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +14%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Global Animal Partnership
    Animals
    2
    Humane World for Animals Inc

    Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O

    Animals
    3
    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

    Protection of animal rights

    Animals
    4
    Animal Wellness Action

    To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

    Human Services
    5
    The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

    Animals
    6
    Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

    To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

    Animals
    7
    World Animal Protection

    World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

    Animals
    8
    The Adoptable Dog
    Animals
    9
    Animal Diplomacy

    Supporting and assisting with rescue, sheltering, spay/neuter, and rehoming of cats and dogs in needy developing countries. Our current exclusive focus is on Egypt and the Egyptian Society for Mercy to Animals.

    Animals
    10
    The Animal Welfare Foundation
    11
    Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

    Animal Welfare

    12
    American Humane Association

    Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

    Animals

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Best Friends Animal Society and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $69,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $29,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSHumane World for Animals International — $29,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals InternationalSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $15,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCAPET PARTNERS — $14,750 · AnimalsPET PARTNERSMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Animals+2 more — $3,950 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES ZOO BOTANICAL GARDENS — $44,503 · OtherLOS ANGELES ZOO BOT…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $11,500 · Environment
    Animals$169,700Other$44,503Human Services$34,000Environment$11,500

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $69,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $29,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International — $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPET PARTNERS — $14,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMANDA FOUNDATION — $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPet Orphans of Southern California — $1,850 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization The Susan Oman Belsky Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph