Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Ohio · Private foundation

The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
5
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$1,250
Largest grant, FY2020
$1,250
Organizations funded a year
4 to 6
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
2
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20205$6k0%
FY20196$6k17%
FY20185$6k20%
FY20174$4kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$8kArts & Culture$5kHealth$5kRecreation & Sports$5kEducation$4kHuman Services$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Raemelton Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc$4,50040%
The Friendly House Association of Mansfield Ohio$4,50040%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($12k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc

How much does The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc give?
The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc reported 7 grants totaling $8,000 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (28%), Arts & Culture (17%), Health (15%).
Who are The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Raemelton Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc ($5k), The Friendly House Association of Mansfield Ohio ($5k).
Does The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc based?
The Steve Goldman Foundation Inc is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steve Goldman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home