Skip to content
The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$294k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.4MHealth$187kHuman Services$20kScience & Tech$15kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STERLING INNOVATORS & MENTORS$59,000
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$20,000
AMERICAN PREPARATORY ACADEMY$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH JOHN A MORAN EYE CENTER$20,000
STEM ACTION CENTER$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING$20,000
THE OTHER SIDE ACADEMY$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION - PRIMARY CHILDREN'S$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $500k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $179k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $177k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $167k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE: $25k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $20k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $13k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $30k → 8%THE LEONARDO: $15k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20k → 8%UTAH FIRST ROBOTICS: $10k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%UTAH FIRST ROBOTICS: $10k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION - PRIMARY CHILDREN'S: $10k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%UTAH FIRST ROBOTICS: $10k → 8%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%UTAH FIRST ROBOTICS: $10k → 8%CANYONS SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%STERLING INNOVATORS & MENTORS: $59k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $20k → 8%AMERICAN PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $20k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $20k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%THE OTHER SIDE ACADEMY: $20k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 8%STEM ACTION CENTER: $20k → 8%STEM ACTION CENTER: $10k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.5M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+334%

Still filing today

33%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $90k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2019–2024 · $90k

Funded once

  • TL
    The Leonardo
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -4%
  • CS
    Canyons School District Education Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +334%
  • IF
    INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $1,055,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $90,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF UTAH JOHN A MORAN EYE CENTER: $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH JOHN A MORAN EYE CENTERSALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $50,000 · Other+6 more: $112,000 · Other+6 moreSTERLING INNOVATORS AND MENTORS: $59,000 · EducationSalt Lake Community College Foundation: $40,000 · EducationCanyons School District Education Foundation: $10,000 · EducationRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $20,000 · HealthThe Other Side Academy: $20,000 · Crime & LegalThe Leonardo: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,477,000Education$109,000Health$20,000Crime & Legal$20,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTERLING INNOVATORS AND MENTORS: $59,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetSalt Lake Community College Foundation: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCanyons School District Education Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STERLING INNOVATORS AND MENTORS ↗
  • Who funds Salt Lake Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds The Leonardo ↗
  • Who funds Canyons School District Education Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…The Community Foundat…Dominion Energy Chari…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Lynda Jacobsen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home