Skip to content
The Sparr Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Sparr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$60kReligion$42k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$251k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in Sei.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST$4,000
DELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP$3,000
MATTHEW AHEARN CO KUTZTOWN UNIVERSI$2,750
YASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM$1,250
RICHARD MANSARAY CO READING AREA CO$1,250
EMILY BYTOF CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$1,250
COVENTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,250
ALYSSA BYTOF CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$1,250
JONATHAN SHIREY CO HARDING UNIVERSI$1,000
TUCKER RUTHERFORD CO DESALES UNIVER$1,000
JACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY$1,000
ISAISH HORN CO READING AREA COMMUNI$1,000
JANELLE SHIREY CO HARDING UNIVERSIT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COVENTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1k → 6%YASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM: $2k → 7%ABIGAIL DUNLEAVY CO PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $1k → 9%RICHARD MANSARAY CO READING AREA CO: $1k → 10%PAOLA LEBRON MUNIZ CO LEHIGH UNIVER: $2k → 11%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $5k → 11%TUCKER RUTHERFORD CO DESALES UNIVER: $1k → 11%EMMA GAWLAS CO LYCOMING COLLEGE: $1k → 12%EMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%ETHAN DOVE CO HARDING UNIVERSITY: $1k → 32%YASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM: $2k → 7%ISAISH HORN CO READING AREA COMMUNI: $1k → 10%PAOLA LEBRON MUNIZ CO LEHIGH UNIVER: $2k → 11%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $5k → 11%EMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%ISABELLA DAVISON CO HARDING UNIVERS: $1k → 32%YASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM: $1k → 7%IZAIAH HORN CO READING AREA COMMUNI: $1k → 10%PAOLA LEBRON MUNIZ CO LEHIGH UNIVER: $1k → 11%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $5k → 11%YASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM: $1k → 7%REBEKAH S DEANE CO NORTHAMPTON COMM: $2k → 11%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $4k → 11%JULIANNE DOVE CO GWYNEDD MERCY UNIV: $1k → 7%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $4k → 11%ANDREW WILLIAMSON CO CAIN UNIVERSIT: $1k → 7%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3k → 11%JULIANNE DOVE CO GWYNEDD MERCY UNIV: $1k → 7%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $2k → 11%JULIANNE DOVE CO GWYNEDD MERCY UNIV: $1k → 7%SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $2k → 11%JULIANNE DOVE CO GWYNEDD MERCY UNIV: $1k → 7%EMILY BYTOF CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%ALYSSA BYTOF CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JANELLE SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%JANELLE SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSI: $1k → 11%REBEKAH S DEANE CO PENN STATE BERKS: $2k → 11%MATTHEW AHEARN CO KUTZTOWN UNIVERSI: $3k → 11%Kainos Church of Christ Ben Shirey: $1k → 11%EMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%EMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%KARREN WALK CO READING AREA COMMUNI: $2k → 11%DELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP: $3k → 11%DELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 8 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
18

Total granted

$68k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+8%

Still filing today

13%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $30k
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue -11%
  • EA
    EMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • RS
    REBEKAH S DEANE CO NORTHAMPTON COMM
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • KS
    KATRINA SNYDER CO OKLAHOMA CHRISITI
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • MA
    MATTHEW AHEARN CO READING AREA COMM
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRIST: $29,904 · OtherSHILLINGTON CHURCH OF CHRISTDELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP INC: $11,000 · OtherDELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP INCEMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherEMMA AHEARN CO TEMPLE UNIVERSITYYASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMM: $5,750 · OtherYASHICA DEANE CO MONTGOMERY CO COMMJULIANNE DOVE CO GWYNEDD MERCY UNIV: $4,000 · OtherPAOLA LEBRON MUNIZ CO LEHIGH UNIVER: $4,000 · OtherJACOB SHIREY CO ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · OtherREBEKAH S DEANE CO READING AREA COM: $3,596 · Other+27 more: $33,750 · Other+27 more
Other$102,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY CHRISTIAN CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sparr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sparr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sparr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sparr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sparr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home