Skip to content

South Carolina · Public charity

The Southern Conference

To facilitate intercollegiate athletics competition for both men and women, promote a proper balance between academics and athletics, foster integrity and excellence in both athletics and academics, foster competitive amateur opportunities of a high quality for student-athletes in a broad spectrum of sports and championships, anticipate…

$110k
Granted FY2019
4
Itemized grants FY2019
4
Organizations funded FY2019
0%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$90k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
3
Total assets, FY2019
$6.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 0% of the organizations The Southern Conference funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20194$90k0%
FY20186$106k0%
FY201710$753kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Recreation & Sports$782kEducation$167k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro$136,5102n/a
East Tennessee State University$115,2783n/a
Samford University$102,77620%
Furman University$101,61020%
Wofford College$98,61330%
The University of Tennessee$95,8323n/a
The Corporation of Mercer University$94,44620%
Commonwealth of Virginia$81,9443n/a
Western Carolina University$65,2782n/a
The Citadel$56,9442n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Southern Conference with peer funders

About The Southern Conference

How much does The Southern Conference give?
The Southern Conference reported 4 itemized grants totaling $90,000, out of $110,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Southern Conference fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (82%), Education (18%).
Who are The Southern Conference's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro ($137k), East Tennessee State University ($115k), Samford University ($103k).
Does The Southern Conference fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Southern Conference?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Folds of Honor Foundation, Tulsa Community Foundation.
Where is The Southern Conference based?
The Southern Conference is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $21k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southern Conference’s filings →

More from the funding graph