Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The South Waite Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$274kArts & Culture$163kPhilanthropy$151kHealth$50kEducation$36kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$65,000
JACKSON LABORATORY$20,000
LAWRENCE SCHOOL$15,000
LAKE VIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION$12,000
THE LAKE METRO PARKS$10,000
MUSICAL ARTS ASSOC$10,000
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART$8,000
CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND$5,000
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$5,000
HOLDEN FOREST AND GARDENS$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE LAKE METRO PARKS: $10k → 9%LAWRENCE SCHOOL: $15k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $65k → 17%JACKSON LABORATORY: $20k → 11%THE LAKE METRO PARKS: $10k → 9%LAWRENCE SCHOOL: $8k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $65k → 17%JACKSON LABORATORY: $20k → 11%RECOVERY RESOURCES: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND: $5k → 17%CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND: $5k → 17%SEE ATTACHED LIST: $151k → 17%LAKE VIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOC: $10k → 17%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOC: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 17%LAKE VIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 17%CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $5k → 17%HOLDEN FOREST AND GARDENS: $4k → 17%HOLDEN FOREST AND GARDENS: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$514k · 11 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$514k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-3%

Still filing today

73%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $255k · revenue +58%
  • TJ
    THE JACKSON LABORATORY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • LS
    LAWRENCE SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CM
    Childrens Museum Cleveland
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • RR
    RECOVERY RESOURCES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -3%
  • W
    WRLC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Western Reserve Historical Society

Western reserve historical society preserves and uses its collections, historic sites, and museums to inspire people to discover the american experience by exploring the tangible history of northeast ohio.

Arts & Culture
3
Akron Art Museum

To enrich lives through modern and contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
4
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
6
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
7
Cleveland Medical Library Association
Education
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
10
Cook Museum of Natural Science
Arts & Culture
11
Lake Erie Nature and Science Center

Lake erie nature & science center educates and inspires each of us to understand, appreciate, and take responsibility for our natural world. serving more than 100,000 people each year with animal exhibits and programs, planetarium shows,…

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland

Moca's mission- art now, in progress - embodies our nature as a living, adaptive platform for artistic experimentation, public exchange, and civic connection. our vision - artists & art lead us to the unfamiliar, where we open and connect…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Museum of Natural History and the most unlike its peers is The Jackson Laboratory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $255,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCYThe Musical Arts Association — $36,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Associatio…CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ARTLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Arts & CultureLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATIO…THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND — $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CL…CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL…LAWRENCE SCHOOL — $36,000 · OtherLAWRENCE SCHOOLLAKE METROPARKS — $20,000 · OtherLAKE METROPARKSHolden Forests & Gardens — $19,000 · OtherHolden Forests & Garde…Childrens Museum Cleveland — $12,000 · OtherChildrens Museum Cleve…WRLC — $8,000 · OtherWRLCHOLDEN FOREST AND GARDENS — $8,000 · OtherHOLDEN FOREST AND GARD…Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Office of Philanthropy — $7,000 · OtherCleveland Museum of Na…THE JACKSON LABORATORY — $40,000 · HealthTHE JACKSO…RECOVERY RESOURCES — $10,000 · HealthRECOVERY R…
Environment$255,000Arts & Culture$136,000Other$110,000Health$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $255,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL — $36,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND — $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRECOVERY RESOURCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY
  • Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds LAKEVIEW CEMETERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds RECOVERY RESOURCES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The South Waite Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph