Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Society for the Study of Evolution

THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION promotes evolutionary biology research, education, application, outreach, and community building in an equitable and globally inclusive manner.

$294k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$448kEmployment$68kScience & Tech$37k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $160,304 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $293,763 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $133,459 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$72,581
WHIO MANAGEMENT LLC$40,617
REED COLLEGE$12,000
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION$10,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$9,498
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$8,465
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$7,143
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $9k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $6k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 17%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $7k → 14%WHIO MANAGEMENT LLC: $41k → 10%REED COLLEGE: $12k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $73k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $7k → 10%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%WHIO MANAGEMENT LLC: $28k → 10%REED COLLEGE: $12k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $69k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $7k → 27%UC BERKELEY: $6k → 10%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%REED COLLEGE: $12k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $68k → 11%REED COLLEGE: $12k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $67k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
CA
CO
VA
NC
SC
GA

Grants abroad, by region — $39k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$13k · 34% · 20 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$11k · 28% · 21 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$9k · 24% · 22 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

East Asia and the Pacific$3k · 8% · 12 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

South Asia$2k · 4% · 34 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

Sub-Saharan Africa$325 · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

Russia and Neighboring States$30 · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

Central America and the Caribbean$10 · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: RESEARCH OR MEETING ATTENDANCE AWARDS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$418k · 5 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$418k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104%
+22%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $277k · revenue +1%
  • WM
    WHIO MANAGEMENT LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $68k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k

Funded once

  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
10
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY — $276,989 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYREED INSTITUTE — $48,000 · EducationREED INSTITUTECOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION+5 more — $34,508 · Education+5 moreWHIO MANAGEMENT LLC — $68,117 · OtherWHIO MANAGEMENT LLCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $30,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLO…KENT STATE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $13,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $9,498 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS — $8,493 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA — $7,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $7,000 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $5,922 · Other
Education$389,497Other$164,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $276,989 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE — $48,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc — $8,465 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $7,143 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds University of Chicago

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Society for the Study of Evolution funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Reed Institute0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph