Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.5MRecreation & Sports$11kReligion$10kPhilanthropy$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$20,000
MARCUS-MERIDIAN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION$12,500
VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL$10,000
OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6.0M → 17%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 17%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 8%WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDIAN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 17%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 8%WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 17%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $8k → 8%WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDIAN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $8k → 8%WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDAN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $8k → 8%TARRYTOWN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 10%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $18k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $8k → 8%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 8%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 8%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 8%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 7%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ART SCHOLARSHIP: $8k → 7%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 8 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$8.5M
$41k

Still filing today

13%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $7.5M · revenue 0%
  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $561k
  • AP
    ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k

Funded once

  • MC
    MARCUS-MERIDAN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • VP
    VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL (GENETTE LARSON-JOHNSON SCHOLARSHIP)
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • AP
    ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ART SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,500,484 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $561,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UN…ARNOLDS PARK HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $157,500 · OtherARNOLDS PARK …OKOBOJI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $87,500 · OtherOKOBOJI EDUCA…VIBORG PUBLIC SCHOOL: $70,000 · OtherVIBORG PUBLIC…MARCUS-MERIDEN CLEGHORN FOUNDATION: $62,500 · OtherMARCUS-MERIDE…WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN DAY SCHOOL: $40,000 · Other+10 more: $68,500 · Other+10 more
Education$7,500,484Other$1,047,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,500,484 over 3y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph