Skip to content

· Public charity

The Simi Hills Preaching Fund

The organization was formed for religious purposes, specifically to preach the gospel through its mission activities and to assist in the establishment of churches.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$269kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $113,863, the rows itemized in this filing. The $151,063 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$456k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIMI HILLS ECCLESIA$27,564
PACIFIC COAST CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE$20,000
SOUTH OZONE PARK CHRISTADELPHIAN EC$15,000
CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION$15,000
ABILENE CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA$12,000
THE CHRISTADELPHIANS$10,000
TEXAS CHRISTADELPHIAN CAMP & CONF C$5,000
THOUSAND OAKS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLE$4,909
NORFOLK CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA$4,390
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION: $22k → 10%SOUTH OZONE PARK CHRISTADELPHIAN EC: $15k → 13%TEXAS CHRISTADELPHIAN CAMP & CONF C: $5k → 16%ABILENE CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA: $12k → 16%DETROIT LIVONIA ECCLESIA: $5k → 21%THE CHRISTADELPHIANS: $10k → 13%NORFOLK CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA: $4k → 19%PACIFIC COAST CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE: $20k → 10%CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION: $15k → 10%CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION: $10k → 10%CHRISTADELPHIAN TIDINGS: $10k → 10%SIMI HILLS ECCLESIA: $55k → 10%SIMI HILLS ECCLESIA: $41k → 10%SIMI HILLS ECCLESIA: $28k → 10%THOUSAND OAKS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIMI HILLS ECCLESIA: $41,283 · OtherSIMI HILLS ECCLESIASIMI HILLS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA: $27,564 · OtherSIMI HILLS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIAPACIFIC COAST CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherPACIFIC COAST CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE SCHOOLSOUTH OZONE PARK CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA: $15,000 · OtherSOUTH OZONE PARK CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIAABILENE CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIA: $12,000 · OtherABILENE CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLESIAADVANCEMENT OF SCRIPTURAL KNOWLEDGE: $12,000 · OtherADVANCEMENT OF SCRIPTURAL KNOWLEDGETHE CHRISTADELPHIANS: $10,000 · OtherTHE CHRISTADELPHIANSCHRISTADELPHIAN TIDINGS: $10,000 · OtherCHRISTADELPHIAN TIDINGSTHOUSAND OAKS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLE: $9,509 · OtherTHOUSAND OAKS CHRISTADELPHIAN ECCLE+4 more: $17,690 · Other+4 moreTHE SIMI HILLS PREACHING FUND: $55,313 · ReligionTHE SIMI HILLS PREACHING FUNDCHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION OF THE AMERICAS: $47,200 · ReligionCHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION OF THE AMER…
Other$175,046Religion$102,513

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SIMI HILLS PREACHING FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE MISSION OF THE AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC COAST CHRISTADELPHIAN BIBLE SCHOOL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Simi Hills Preaching Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Simi Hills Preaching Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Simi Hills Preaching Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Simi Hills Preaching Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Simi Hills Preaching’s filings →

    More from the funding graph