Skip to content
The Siegel Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Siegel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$566k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$524kHuman Services$85kHousing & Shelter$12kYouth Development$12k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $550k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION$200,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$200,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$75,000
SID JACOBSON JCC$75,000
INDIANA CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$10,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY & CHILDRENS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $12k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 17%SID JACOBSON JCC: $75k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 3 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$120k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $491k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $98k
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +11%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FA
    FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • HB
    HEMPSTEAD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $98,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL+2 more: $12,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCINDIANA CANCER WELLNESS CENTER CORP: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $5,700 · HealthSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesSID JACOBSON JEWI…COVENANT HOUSE: $12,200 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHILDR…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$310,000Health$215,700Human Services$97,200Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $12,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA CANCER WELLNESS CENTER CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Siegel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Siegel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Siegel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home