Skip to content

· Public charity

The SERC Foundation Inc

To establish and administer specific funds which funds shall be utilized to provide grants and/or loans to particular designated individuals and associations with the objectives of advancing the education of all connecticut students and decreasing disparities in educational outcomes.

$160k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
—
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $152,231, the rows itemized in this filing. The $159,725 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,494 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k8 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
$7,140
Median grant
—
States reached
$338k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New London Youth Affairs$23,346
Stamford Public Education Foundation$21,956
Milford Health Department$16,359
Windsor Public Schools$16,359
Norwich Youth and Family Services$11,879
Stratford School Readiness and Childcare Council$11,584
Family Life Education$7,140
Catholic Charities of Hartford$7,119
CREC$7,111
Enfield Public Schools$7,108
Windsor Locks Public Schools$6,457
Manchester Public Schools$5,323
Middletown Public Schools$5,261
East Hartford Public Schools$5,229
02Its field
02the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LONDON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $23,346 · OtherNEW LONDON PUBLIC SCHOOLSWindsor Public Schools: $16,359 · OtherWindsor Public SchoolsMilford Health Department: $16,359 · OtherMilford Health DepartmentNorwich Youth and Family Services: $11,879 · OtherNorwich Youth and Family ServicesStratford School Readiness and Childcare Council: $11,584 · OtherStratford School Readiness and Childcare CouncilFAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INC: $7,140 · OtherFAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INCCAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCIL: $7,111 · OtherCAPITOL REGION EDUCATION COUNCILEnfield Public Schools: $7,108 · OtherEnfield Public SchoolsWindsor Locks Public Schools: $6,457 · OtherManchester Public Schools: $5,323 · OtherMiddletown Public Schools: $5,261 · OtherEast Hartford Public Schools: $5,229 · OtherSTAMFORD PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $21,956 · PhilanthropySTAMFORD PUBLIC …CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $7,119 · Human Services
Other$123,156Philanthropy$21,956Human Services$7,119

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAMFORD PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $21,956 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INC: $7,140 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $7,119 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAMFORD PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The SERC Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The SERC Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford: 52% of income from government
  • Stamford Public Education Foundation Inc: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
03Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The SERC Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The SERC Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on SERC’s filings →

More from the funding graph