Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sedberry Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$31kEducation$28kFood & Nutrition$12kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$5kReligion$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,630
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gigis Playhouse New Orleans$3,631
St Jude Childrens REsearch Hospital$3,631
St Marys Residential Training School$3,631
Louisiana Baptist Foundation$3,631
Shriners Hospitals for Children$3,630
Louisiana State University Foundati$3,500
Louisiana 4-H Foundation$1,500
LA Found for Agric in the Classroom$1,500
Redstick Cares$803
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $903) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries I: $100 → 13%Redstick Cares: $803 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Sedberry Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in LA; by stated purpose, 78%.

The Sedberry Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 10 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$77k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+14%

Still filing today

40%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +103%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +29%
  • L4
    LOUISIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • SH
    Shriners Hospital for Children
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • LF
    LA Foundation for Agriculture in Cl
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • LB
    LA Baptist Ag Missions Fellowship
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Mary's Residential Training Scho: $10,200 · OtherSt Mary's Residential Training SchoLouisiana Baptist Foundation: $7,373 · OtherLouisiana Baptist FoundationLouisiana State University Foundati: $7,242 · OtherLouisiana State University FoundatiShriners Hospital for Children: $6,500 · OtherShriners Hospital for ChildrenGigis Playhouse New Orleans: $6,431 · OtherGigis Playhouse New OrleansST MARYS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING SCHOOL: $6,431 · OtherST MARYS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING SCHOOLLOUISIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $5,242 · OtherLOUISIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INCLA Foundation for Agriculture in Cl: $3,000 · OtherLA Baptist Ag Missions Fellowship: $3,000 · OtherLSU 4-H Foundation: $2,000 · Other+4 more: $2,200 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,931 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESE…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,457 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR …LSU FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationLSU FOUNDATIONREDSTICK CARES: $803 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$59,619Health$19,388Education$14,000Human Services$903

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,931 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,457 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $5,242 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REDSTICK CARES ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sedberry Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sedberry Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sedberry’s filings →

More from the funding graph