Skip to content
The Sayre Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Sayre Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,965
Median grant
7
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREGNANCY CARE CTR$20,000
THE VILLAGE NETWORK$10,000
CARE AND SHARE OF WAYNE CTY$8,800
THE CARING CLOSET$8,300
RICHLAND PREGNANCY SERVICES$5,500
POWER CROSS$5,000
CRU$3,750
SACRED GROUND$2,000
GIVE GIFT OF CHRISTMAS WALMART$1,965
REVIVAL TODAY$1,500
FRIENDS OF HAITIAN RELIEF$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$663
WEST VIEW HEALTHY LIVING$500
ANDREW WOMMACK MINISTRIES$250
AWAKENING MINISTRIES$250
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE CARING CLOSET: $8k → 10%SACRED GROUND: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
2
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
3
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
4
Abigail Women's Clinic - Pregnancy Outreach Center

Abigail Womens Clinics mission is to provide free and confidential services, education,counseling, support, and encouragement to individuals allowing them to make healthy choices related to sexuality and childbearing from a Biblical point…

Health
5
New Day Women's Clinic Inc

New day women's clinic, inc. is a christian organization dedicated to saving the unborn through nurturing and educating expectant mothers and their families and providing real help and healing for those who suffer from the aftermath of…

Health
6
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
7
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
8
Pregnancy Help Center of Williamson County Dba Wilco Womens Center

The mission of WilCo Womens Center (WWC) is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately meeting the spiritual, emotional, and physical needs of women, men, and their unborn children. We affirm the sanctity of all human life by…

Human Services
9
Wise Choices Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Assistance to pregnant women in crisis, offering free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, sti testing, counseling, education and referrals to aid the mother and father as advocates for the unborn. we empower life affirming choices.

Human Services
10
Havelock Pregnancy Resource Center

To provide christ centered ministry to individuals seeking pregnancy related resources by upholding the sanctity of life through the provision of spiritual,physical, and emotional support.

Human Services
11
New Beginnings Christian Care Inc

New Beginnings offers pregnancy testing, limited ultrasound referrals, helps women bring their babies to term and become responsible, loving mothers.

—
12
Palouse Care Network Inc

We are a Christian Organization that provides confidential and compassionate care in the form of specialized medical, practical and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy, parenting, sexuality and abortion related issues.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richland Crisis Pregnancy Services; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREGNANCY CARE CTR: $20,000 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CTRCARE AND SHARE OF WAYNE CTY: $8,800 · OtherCARE AND SHARE OF WAYNE CTYCRU: $3,750 · OtherCRUGIVE GIFT OF CHRISTMAS WALMART: $1,965 · Other+6 more: $2,663 · Other+6 moreRICHLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY SERVICES: $10,500 · HealthRICHLAND CRISIS PREGNANC…PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF…+1 more: $500 · HealthTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $20,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VILLAGE NETWORKTHE CARING CLOSET: $8,300 · Human ServicesTHE CARING C…SACRED GROUND: $2,000 · Human ServicesSACRED GROUN…POWER CROSS: $5,000 · ReligionREVIVAL TODAY INC: $1,500 · ReligionAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc: $250 · Religion
Other$37,178Health$21,000Crime & Legal$20,000Human Services$10,300Religion$6,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRICHLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY SERVICES: $10,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CARING CLOSET: $8,300 over 1y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sayre Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sayre Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sayre’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home