Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sandra and Harvey Belfer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$21kHealth$19kArts & Culture$14kEducation$10kScience & Tech$5kPhilanthropy$4kHuman Services$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$920k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$5,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$5,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$2,500
KIDS NEED TO READ$2,000
ARIZONA MUSICFEST$1,000
SMILE ON SENIORS$1,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$1,000
LYON CLUB BILTMORE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 10 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$133k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+4%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +113%
  • HO
    Hospice of the Valley
    4× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +54%
  • AM
    ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PP
    PAJAMA PROGRAM AZ CHAPTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Israel Technology Alliance

Collaborative initiatives between az and israel

—
2
Arizona Alzheimers Research Center Inc

Alzheimers disease research

Health
3
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ

American friends of tel aviv university (aftau) raises awareness and funds to support tel aviv university (tau) and advance its three-part mission of education, research and community building in the us. aftau shares the innovative work…

International
6
Arizona Medical Association Inc

The arizona medical association is the strongest advocate, ally, and resource for arizona's physicians and physicians-in-training. together, we are fostering the practice of medicine, championing patient care, and strengthening the…

—
7
American Federation for Aging Research Inc

The american federation for aging research (afar) is a national organization whose mission is to support and advance healthy aging through biomedical research. it fulfills this mission by: supporting research through grant programs that…

Social Science
8
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
11
The Arizona Animal Welfare League

The mission of aawl/spca is to provide excellent care, protection, and loving compassion for the life of the animals entrusted to us and to take a leadership role in promoting humane values for the benefit of all animals and people. aawl…

Animals
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley; the most unlike its peers is Community Paws Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $69,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherHOLOCAUST MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE: $8,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSENATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $4,100 · Other+6 more: $9,500 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $13,200 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCI…Hospice of the Valley: $11,000 · Human ServicesKIDS NEED TO READ: $7,000 · EducationCommunity Paws Inc: $1,500 · EducationBILTMORE LIONS CLUB: $4,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Health
Other$111,100International$18,200Human Services$11,000Education$8,500Philanthropy$4,000Arts & Culture$3,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $13,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS NEED TO READ: $7,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILTMORE LIONS CLUB: $4,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Paws Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds KIDS NEED TO READ ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds BILTMORE LIONS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sandra and Harvey Belfer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sandra and Harvey Belfer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandra and Harvey Belfer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph