Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sam & Salwa Ellis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$370kHealth$220kEducation$133kCommunity Improvement$67kArts & Culture$55kYouth Development$52kRecreation & Sports$47kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Emilio Nares Foundation$10,000
VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$10,000
VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
Lay Brothers of the Poor$10,000
Turning Point Ministries$10,000
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE$10,000
SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
GRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES$10,000
Imperial Valley New Creations$10,000
Imperial County Historical Society$7,500
Hermanas Del Corazon De Jesus Sacra$7,500
Calexico Baja Runners$7,500
YOUTH FOR CHRIST IMPERIAL VALLEY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $10k → 17%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%Emilio Nares Foundation: $10k → 11%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%SAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 21%CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $10k → 21%VOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%VINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 21%GRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%Turning Point Ministries: $10k → 21%GRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%Turning Point Ministries: $10k → 21%GRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%GRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$954k · 17 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$954k
$3k

Still filing today

24%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    Emilio Nares Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +65%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +145%
  • IC
    IMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • VO
    Veterans of Foreign Wars
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE: $70,000 · OtherCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THEGRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIES: $67,000 · OtherGRACE AND TRUTH MINISTRIESImperial Valley New Creations: $67,000 · OtherImperial Valley New CreationsVOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001: $67,000 · OtherVOICE INCORPORATED-KGBA 1001CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $67,000 · OtherCHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCHVINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $66,500 · OtherVINCENT MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLSAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $66,500 · OtherSAINT MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOLIMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 · OtherIMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYYOUTH FOR CHRIST IMPERIAL VALLEY: $52,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST IMPERIAL VALLEYHermanas Del Corazon De Jesus Sacra: $50,500 · OtherHermanas Del Corazon De Jesus SacraLay Brothers of the Poor: $50,000 · OtherLay Brothers of the PoorCALEXICO BAJA RUNNERS: $47,000 · OtherCALEXICO BAJA RUNNERS+4 more: $24,500 · OtherEmilio Nares Foundation: $70,000 · HealthEmilio Nares Fou…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC: $67,000 · Religion
Other$750,000Health$140,000Religion$67,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmilio Nares Foundation: $70,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT COUNSELING INC: $67,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetIMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emilio Nares Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sam & Salwa Ellis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sam & Salwa Ellis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam & Salwa Ellis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph