Skip to content

· Public charity

The Salesian Women Association Inc

Supported educational programs for children and youth in underserved areas through partnerships with global nonprofits.

$40k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$330kHuman Services$61kReligion$15kEducation$14kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRO LA MILAGROSA$25,714
CENTRO GUSTAVITO LUJAN$5,000
CENTRO DON FELIPE RINALDI$5,000
CENTRO SANTO DOMINGO SAVIO DEL CONS$3,500
CENTRO LA CHINITA DE MARA$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 55% of grant dollars ($235k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 45% that went abroad ($192k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OTHER DONATIONS: $6k → 15%ST JOHN BOSCO CHURCH: $6k → 15%ST JOHN BOSCO: $4k → 15%ST JOHN BOSCO: $2k → 15%ST JOHN BOSCO: $2k → 15%CENTRO LA MILAGROSA: $26k → 15%CENTRO GUSTAVITO LUJAN: $5k → 15%CENTRO DON FELIPE RINALDI: $5k → 15%CENTRO SANTO DOMINGO SAVIO DEL CONS: $4k → 15%CENTRO LA CHINITA DE MARA: $800 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 45% of all-years giving ($192k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Venezuela$192k · 15 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$355k · 13 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$355k
$63k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CENTRO LA MILAGROSA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $94k
  • CL
    CENTRO LA CHINITA DE MARACAIBO
    4× · 2019–2022 · $75k
  • CG
    CENTRO GUSTAVITO LUJAN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $49k

Funded once

  • PV
    PADRE VIGANO Y CENTRO MARIA AUXILIADORA
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
  • CM
    CENTRO MAMA MARGARITA - LA DOLORITA
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2023.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRO LA MILAGROSA: $93,718 · OtherCENTRO LA MILAGROSACENTRO LA CHINITA DE MARACAIBO: $74,972 · OtherCENTRO LA CHINITA DE MARACAIBOCENTRO GUSTAVITO LUJAN: $48,500 · OtherCENTRO GUSTAVITO LUJANCENTRO GUSTAVITO GARCIA LUJAN: $42,201 · OtherCENTRO GUSTAVITO GARCIA LUJANPADRE VIGANO Y CENTRO MARIA AUXILIADORA: $22,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,053 · OtherCENTRO LA DORADITA: $18,243 · Other+20 more: $105,501 · Other+20 more
Other$426,613

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Salesian Women Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Salesian Women Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Salesian Women Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph