Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$312k
Granted FY2024still arriving
109
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0161% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MPhilanthropy$96kEducation$56kInternational$23kHuman Services$18kHealth$6kArts & Culture$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k99 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $121k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA ATERET TORAH$63,017
ATERET TORAH$57,652
CONGREGATION BET SHMUEL$18,800
JEWISH SUCCESS INITIATIVE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,050
CONGREGATION SHAARE RAHAMIM INC$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,000
JEWISH SCHOLARSHIP INITIATIVE FOR SYNAGOGUE SCHOOLS$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,592
KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL$10,000
YESHIVA OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD$7,361
YAD YOSEF$7,302
OHEL TORAH$5,308
Individual grant recipient$4,540
BET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR$4,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $500 → 14%BETH OLOTH: $573 → 14%BETH OLOTH: $72 → 14%BETH OLOTH: $72 → 14%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $700 → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $101 → 6%SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $180 → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $301 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $200 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $152 → 20%DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $52 → 20%A TIME: $208 → 20%A TIME: $201 → 20%ATIME: $108 → 20%A TIME: $101 → 20%MISASKIM: $851 → 20%MISASKIM: $540 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $180 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $180 → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $500 → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $126 → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $126 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 236 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

236 repeat relationships: 76 still active in FY2024, 160 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

236
110

Total granted

$2.7M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+9%

Still filing today

17%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $66k · revenue +4%
  • MF
    MABAS FUND INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $23k · revenue +356%
  • BM
    BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH
    5× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +447%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • BH
    BEIT HASHEM NEHALECH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
12
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 378 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/78
Grantees still filing
53/78
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATERET TORAH CENTER: $808,236 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $538,761 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+169 more: $1,245,811 · Other+169 moreYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $65,612 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $23,100 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $22,081 · EducationMAGEN ABRAHAM INC: $17,250 · EducationYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $16,663 · EducationMATTEH MOSHE INC: $11,226 · EducationBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $7,712 · Education+3 more: $7,992 · EducationYeshivat Lev Torah: $11,621 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $7,647 · ReligionKEREN HORAINU INC: $4,500 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $3,000 · ReligionPeleh Foundation Inc: $2,900 · ReligionKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,500 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,466 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MEIR INC: $1,952 · ReligionKOLLEL OF MEMPHIS INC: $1,750 · Religion+2 more: $2,076 · ReligionHESED FOUNDATION: $7,250 · PhilanthropyAMUDEI CHESED INC: $2,122 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $866 · PhilanthropySEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $8,248 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $4,403 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $1,080 · InternationalSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,852 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $1,391 · Human Services
Other$2,592,808Education$171,636Religion$40,412Philanthropy$10,238Youth Development$8,248International$5,483Human Services$4,243

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $65,612 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $23,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $22,081 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM INC: $17,250 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $16,663 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOhel Torah: $13,143 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $11,621 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMATTEH MOSHE INC: $11,226 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $8,248 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $7,712 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $7,647 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHESED FOUNDATION: $7,250 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $6,272 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HORAINU INC: $4,500 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $4,403 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPeleh Foundation Inc: $2,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,852 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,466 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARYEH CHESED FUND INC: $2,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $2,122 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2,102 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS CHANA WOMEN INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,031 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MEIR INC: $1,952 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,836 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OF MEMPHIS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,391 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMasmid Govoha: $1,390 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $1,266 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,080 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $866 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $810 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Torah ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marbeh Shalom Foundation IncNY128.8× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Ic Hessed Foundation · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 378 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Safdeye Brothers’ filings →

More from the funding graph