Skip to content
The Russ Krivor Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Russ Krivor Family Foundation Inc

$72k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Religion$731kEducation$165kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$647
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF CHABAD NORTH SHORE INC$50,000
TIKVA CORP$15,000
THE BEACH MINYAN AT THE SUMMER SHUL INC$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BEACH MINYAN AT THE SUMMER SHUL INC: $7k → 7%YESHIVAT TORAT HACHEN INC: $5k → 13%FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES: $10k → 17%ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCEITY: $10k → 20%CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH SYNAGOGUE: $461k → 15%LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF THE LOOP: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL: $71k → 11%TIKVA CORP: $150k → 16%OROT CHAIM VE MOSHE: $35k → 17%CHABAD LUBAVITCH: $72k → 20%TIKVA CORP: $15k → 16%FRIENDS OF CHABAD NORTH SHORE INC: $50k → 20%CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH SYNAGOGUE: $461,000 · OtherCHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH SYNAGOGUECHABAD LUBAVITCH: $72,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCHCONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL INC: $71,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL INCOROT HAIM VE MOSHE: $35,000 · Other+4 more: $31,500 · OtherTIKVA CORP: $165,000 · EducationTIKVA CORPFRIENDS OF TRI CITIES CHABAD INC: $50,000 · ReligionCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · ReligionROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$670,500Education$165,000Religion$70,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIKVA CORP: $165,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TRI CITIES CHABAD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Russ Krivor Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Russ Krivor Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Russ Krivor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home