Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rudolph Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$352kArts & Culture$147kAnimals$98kHealth$68kReligion$55kRecreation & Sports$37kHuman Services$32kEmployment$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WBOI$31,250
Ding Darling Wildlife Society$25,250
DePauw University Scholarship Fund$10,000
WashingtonLee Study Abroad Scholars$10,000
Washington Lee University Scholarsh$10,000
Wabash College Scholarship$10,000
Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum Aquari$7,500
Blue Jacket Inc$7,500
Fort Wayne Children's Zoo$7,000
Fort Wayne Trails Inc$6,000
Sanibel Public Library Foundation$5,000
Positive Resource Connection$4,566
Sanibel Captiva Conservation Founda$4,000
FISH of Sanibel$3,500
Literary Alliance of Fort Wayne$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FISH of Sanibel: $5k → 11%FISH of Sanibel: $4k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA: $4k → 11%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE: $24k → 12%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE: $21k → 12%Positive Resource Connection: $5k → 12%Positive Resource Connection: $3k → 12%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$812k · 26 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
10

Total granted

$812k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+24%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    5× · 2019–2023 · $76k · revenue +43%
  • Washington and Lee University
    5× · 2019–2023 · $61k · revenue +54%
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • M2
    MATTHEW 25 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +54%
  • BO
    Bridge of Grace Compassionate Minis
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSE OF SANIBEL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
6
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WashingtonLee Study Abroad Scholars: $100,000 · OtherWashingtonLee Study Abroad ScholarsBRIDGE OF COMPANSSIONATE MINISTRIES: $55,000 · OtherBRIDGE OF COMPANSSIONATE MINISTRIESNORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC RADIO: $54,000 · OtherNORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC RADIOFORT WAYNE CHILDREN ZOO: $22,000 · OtherFORT WAYNE CHILDREN ZOOWabash College Scholarship: $20,000 · OtherWashington Lee University Scholarsh: $20,000 · OtherDePauw University Scholarship Fund: $20,000 · OtherTHE LITERARY ALLIANCE OF FORT WAYNE: $18,910 · OtherHomebound Meals Inc: $17,000 · Other+15 more: $74,088 · Other+15 moreDePauw University: $75,500 · EducationDePauw UniversityWashington and Lee University: $60,500 · EducationWashington and Lee Univer…Wabash College: $50,000 · EducationWabash College+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $54,782 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $49,750 · AnimalsFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $12,000 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $3,090 · AnimalsNORTHEAST INDIANA PUBLIC RADIO INC: $59,936 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,750 · Arts & CultureFORT WAYNE TRAILS INC: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsBLUE JACKET INC: $28,500 · Crime & LegalMATTHEW 25 INC: $8,000 · Health
Other$400,998Education$191,000Human Services$66,782Animals$64,840Arts & Culture$61,686Recreation & Sports$36,000Crime & Legal$28,500Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDePauw University: $75,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $60,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA PUBLIC RADIO INC: $59,936 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $54,782 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWabash College: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $49,750 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WAYNE TRAILS INC: $36,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetBLUE JACKET INC: $28,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHomebound Meals Inc: $17,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANIBEL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $3,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROAD CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,750 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wabash College ↗
  • Who funds DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE JACKET INC ↗
  • Who funds Homebound Meals Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROAD CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward M Wilson FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward M Wilson Foundation · The Donald F Wood and Darlene M Richardson Foundation Inc · M E Raker Foundation Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ian & Miriam Rolland Foundation · Journal Gazette Foundation Inc · Kuhne Charles Char Fdn T-W Main · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · Do It Best Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rudolph Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rudolph Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rudolph Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rudolph Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rudolph Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph