Skip to content

· Public charity

The Rotary Club of Sebastopol Foundation Inc

Formed in 1925, this club has been going strong for almost 100 years, funding and volunteering for worthy projects such as Learn-to-Swim, Learn-with-Me, Interact, and an International Youth Exchange program.

$161k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$269kInternational$51kCommunity Improvement$18kYouth Development$17k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $12,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $161,372 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $148,772 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Laguna High School$6,300
Analy High School$6,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($315k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($40k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Santa Rosa Junior College: $16k → 9%Santa Rosa Junior College: $14k → 9%Santa Rosa Junior College: $14k → 9%Santa Rosa Junior College: $13k → 9%Santa Rosa Junior College: $12k → 9%West Sonoma Cnty High School: $26k → 9%West Sonoma Cnty High School: $23k → 9%West Sonoma Cnty High School: $20k → 9%Sebastopol Chamber of Commerc: $18k → 9%Sebastopol Union School Distr: $14k → 9%West Sonoma Cnty High School: $13k → 9%Sebastopol Union School Distr: $12k → 9%West Sonoma Cnty High School: $10k → 9%Sebastopol Union School Distr: $10k → 9%Analy High School: $6k → 9%Laguna High School: $6k → 9%Sebastopol Union School Distr: $5k → 9%Cloverleaf Ranch: $10k → 9%Cloverleaf Ranch: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($40k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$23k · 1 grant
Mexico$17k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 6 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$285k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+149%

Still filing today

33%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    West Sonoma County Union High School District
    5× · 2017–2021 · $92k
  • SR
    SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $69k · revenue +132%
  • SR
    Sebastopol Rotary Education Foundation
    3× · 2017–2020 · $49k · revenue +40% · 46% of their budget

Funded once

  • RC
    Rotary Club of Lira Uganda
    one grant, 2019 · $23k
  • SC
    SEBASTOPOL CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +149%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL SUNRISE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West Sonoma County Union High School District: $92,001 · OtherWest Sonoma County Union High School DistrictSebastopol Union School Distr: $41,343 · OtherSebastopol Union School DistrRotary Club of Lira Uganda: $23,428 · OtherRotary Club of Lira UgandaSEBASTOPOL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,500 · OtherSEBASTOPOL CHAMBER OF COMMERCEIndividual grant recipient: $17,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRotary Club Puerto Vallarta: $16,500 · OtherRotary Club Puerto Vallarta+2 more: $12,600 · Other+2 moreSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $69,000 · EducationSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSebastopol Rotary Education Foundation: $49,124 · EducationSebastopol Rotary Education Foundatio…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $11,525 · InternationalROTARY CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL SUNRISE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,161 · Philanthropy
Other$220,472Education$118,124International$11,525Philanthropy$5,161

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $69,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSebastopol Rotary Education Foundation: $49,124 over 3y, 46% of budgetSEBASTOPOL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $11,525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL SUNRISE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,161 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sebastopol Rotary Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SEBASTOPOL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF SEBASTOPOL SUNRISE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rotary Club of Sebastopol Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rotary Club of Sebastopol Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $217k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Sebastopol’s filings →

    More from the funding graph