Skip to content

· Public charity

The Rotary Club of Paulding County Foundation Inc

Community support and welfare

$82k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
—
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHATTAHOOCHEE TECH FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,100
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MCKENNA FARMS$1,000
PAULDING CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$1,000
FAMILY ALLIANCE OF PAULDING$1,000
SHEPHERD'S REST MINISTRIES$1,000
CAYA$1,000
TRUTH IN NATURE$1,000
COPS FOR KIDS$1,000
HELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY INC$1,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,000
4-H CLUB$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 11 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$63k
$20k

Still filing today

9%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    Shepherd's Rest Ministries
    2× · 2025–2026 · $16k
  • MF
    McKenna Farms
    2× · 2025–2026 · $12k
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY I
    2× · 2025–2026 · $11k · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • TW
    Together We Care
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • AH
    A Hand Up Homeless Outreach
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • AB
    A Buddy's Hope
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
02the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHATTAHOOCHEE TECH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCHATTAHOOCHEE TECH FOUNDATIONShepherd's Rest Ministries: $16,000 · OtherShepherd's Rest MinistriesMcKenna Farms: $12,000 · OtherMcKenna FarmsHELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY I: $11,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY IIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,100 · Other+15 more: $35,200 · Other+15 more
Other$150,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY I ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rotary Club of Paulding County Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rotary Club of Paulding County Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rotary Club of Paulding County Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Rotary Club of Paulding County Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Paulding County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph