Skip to content
The Rosenfield & Glassman Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosenfield & Glassman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$569kHuman Services$151kPhilanthropy$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
$19,980
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU LANGONE HEALTH$39,942
IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS$25,092
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF FLORIDA$20,035
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY$19,980
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NJ$19,975
ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC$14,976
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$14,976
GREATER GOOD CHARITIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $15k → 9%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $40k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF FLORIDA: $20k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF S FLA: $5k → 15%STAR INC: $10k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $25k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NJ: $20k → 16%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $15k → 9%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $36k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH EAST AND NORTH FLORIDA: $10k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $21k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NJ: $10k → 16%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $10k → 9%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $35k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH & NORTH FLORIDA: $10k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $15k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NJ: $10k → 16%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $20k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH & NORTH FLORIDA: $10k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $10k → 10%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $10k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $15k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF S FLORIDA & THE TREASURE COAST: $10k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $10k → 10%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $15k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH EAST AND NORTH FLORIDA: $8k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $10k → 10%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $5k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH EAST AND NORTH FLORIDA: $5k → 11%IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $10k → 10%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $5k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40k → 17%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 9%DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $5k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY: $20k → 17%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY: $10k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$690k
$50k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $165k · revenue +160%
  • IA
    IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $101k · revenue +58%
  • ET
    ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - CROHN'S & COLITIS CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF S FLORIDA & THE TREASURE COAST
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
2
Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc

Planned parenthood of southern new england provides high-quality health care, education, and advocacy to advance equity and protect the fundamental right to sexual health and reproductive freedom for all.

Health
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual…

Health
5
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
6
Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.

Health
7
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
8
Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc

The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…

Health
9
Planned Parenthood of the Mid-Hudson Valley Inc

Planned parenthood of the mid-hudson valley empowers individuals to make independent, informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive lives by providing access to high quality, evidence-based and medically-sound health care and…

—
10
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
11
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
12
Betterhealth a Planned Parenthood Partnership

Provide innovative solutions to advance the planned parenthood promise of 'care, no matter what' through better access and experience, leading to better outcomes and betterhealth.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Greater New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Therapeutic Horsemanship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $165,426 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATIONIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $100,917 · HealthIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSSENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $65,270 · HealthENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $49,773 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $42,643 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $40,090 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INCWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,087 · HealthWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INCNYU LANGONE HEALTH: $110,551 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NJ: $40,086 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH & NORTH FLORIDA: $20,111 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH & NORTH…UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - CROHN'S & COLITIS CENTER: $10,274 · OtherWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF ILLINOIS: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF S FLORIDA & THE TREASURE COAST: $9,977 · OtherSTAR INC: $9,944 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$499,206Other$230,943Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $165,426 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $100,917 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $65,270 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $49,773 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $42,643 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $40,090 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,087 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS ↗
  • Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GOOD CHARITIES ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosenfield & Glassman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosenfield & Glassman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosenfield & Glassman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home