Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

THE ROSEBRAUGH CHARITABLE TRUST co FRED E ROSEBRAUGH TTEE

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Food & Nutrition$219kHealth$82kHousing & Shelter$33kPhilanthropy$25kEducation$14kCrime & Legal$11k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON FOOD BANK$15,000
OHSU FOUNDATION$14,000
LOAVES FISHES CENTER$14,000
FRIENDS IN DEED$10,000
NW MEDICAL TEAMS INTL INC$5,000
SHARE INC$5,000
ARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS IN DEED: $10k → 14%DCH FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $15k → 12%SHARE INC: $7k → 9%FRIENDS IN DEED: $5k → 14%DCH FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $15k → 12%SHARE INC: $6k → 9%FRIENDS IN DEED: $5k → 14%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $14k → 12%SHARE INC: $5k → 9%FRIENDS IN DEED: $4k → 14%OHSU FOUNDATION: $14k → 12%SHARE INC: $5k → 9%FRIENDS IN DEED: $1k → 14%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $14k → 12%SHARE INC: $5k → 9%DOERNBECCHER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOU: $14k → 12%SHARE INC: $5k → 9%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $10k → 12%CLARK CNTY FOOD BANK: $10k → 9%DOERNBECCHER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOU: $14k → 12%CLARK CNTY FOOD BANK: $10k → 9%LOAVES FISHES CENTER: $10k → 12%CLARK CNTY FOOD BANK: $4k → 9%DOERNBECCHER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOU: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$356k · 8 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$356k
$14k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2024 · $117k · revenue +62%
  • SHARE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +70%
  • AJ
    ARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT
    6× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $14k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OREGON FOOD BANK — $117,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKLOAVES FISHES CENTER — $78,000 · OtherLOAVES FISHES CENTERDOERNBECCHER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOU — $38,000 · OtherDOERNBECCHER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUSHARE — $33,000 · OtherSHARENW MEDICAL TEAMS INTL INC — $30,000 · OtherNW MEDICAL TEAMS INTL INCFRIENDS IN DEED — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS IN DEEDCLARK CNTY FOOD BANK — $24,000 · OtherCLARK CNTY FOOD BANKOHSU FOUNDATION — $14,000 · OtherDCH Foundation Inc — $14,000 · EducationARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT — $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$359,000Education$14,000Crime & Legal$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $117,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE — $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDCH Foundation Inc — $14,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT — $11,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SHARE
  • Who funds DCH Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization THE ROSEBRAUGH CHARITABLE TRUST co FRED E ROSEBRAUGH TTEE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph