Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rose and Bernard Strauss Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

International$298kHuman Services$12kHealth$11kPhilanthropy$8kArts & Culture$2kEducation$1kAnimals$1kOther$119k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$990k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE IDF (FIDF)$20,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY$5,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$5,000
CROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM (AFMDA)$5,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER$5,000
MAZON$5,000
COMMUNITY CUPBOARD OF AMBLER$2,000
FRIENDS OF YAD LAKASHISH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MAIN LINE ART CENTER$2,000
BUCKS COUNTY SPCA$1,000
JEFFERSON HEALTH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 7%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $500 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131k · 8 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$131k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+581%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    7× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +206%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND - RESILIENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND - THERAPETUIC RIDING
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jerusalem Connection
2
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
3
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Abraham & Florence Mendel Foundation
7
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Joseph and Malka Melohn Foundation
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Relief Agency and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $255,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $42,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMCROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $38,000 · OtherCROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION OF…FRIENDS OF THE IDF (FIDF) — $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IDF (FIDF)ISRAEL GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $15,500 · OtherISRAEL GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLI…Individual grant recipient — $12,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLEL CHABAD — $10,000 · OtherCOLEL CHABADJEWISH NATIONAL FUND - RESILIENCE — $6,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUND - THERAPETUIC RIDING — $5,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $7,000 · Other+4 moreISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $6,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY — $5,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $500 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 · HealthJEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyMain Line Art Center — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,000 · Animals
International$297,500Other$118,750Human Services$12,000Health$11,000Philanthropy$7,500Arts & Culture$2,000Education$1,000Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $255,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $42,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMain Line Art Center — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY
  • Who funds Main Line Art Center
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds JEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK
  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rose and Bernard Strauss Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph