Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robinson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$649k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of The Robinson Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Corporation Of Haverford College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
22
4
23
3
24
3
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$1.5MInternational$13kReligion$10kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$25,001
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAVERFORD COLLEGE$400,000
HAVERFORD COLLEGE$50,001
THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$50,000
THE DALTON SCHOOL$50,000
THE DALTON SCHOOL$25,001
PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY$25,001
PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY$25,000
NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INC$10,000
THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$10,000
FRANCISCAN MISSION ASSOCIATES$2,500
QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ACCT #31010 SINOP ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $400k → 10%QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ACCT #31010 THE SINOP ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJ: $1k → 13%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1k → 17%TAOS SPORTS ASSOCIATES INC: $1k → 18%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $25k → 5%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $400k → 10%QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 13%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $25k → 5%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $125k → 10%QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 13%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $25k → 5%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $50k → 10%QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ACCT #31010 SINOP ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT: $1k → 13%THE DALTON SCHOOL: $50k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $25k → 5%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $50k → 10%THE DALTON SCHOOL: $25k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $25k → 5%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $49k → 10%THE DALTON SCHOOL: $25k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $15k → 5%THE DALTON SCHOOL: $25k → 17%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 74% of The Robinson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Robinson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$460k · 6 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$460k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $140k · revenue +4%
  • DS
    DALTON SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +2%
  • QC
    QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -36%
  • QC
    QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ACCT #31010 THE SINOP ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJ
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • TS
    Taos Sports Associates Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
11
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
12
Providence College

See schedule oprovidence college is a catholic, dominican, liberal arts institution of higher education and a community committed to academic excellence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University and the most unlike its peers is Taos Sports Associates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $1,074,002 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGEPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $140,004 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMYDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $125,003 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INC+1 more — $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY — $180,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES O…FRANCISCAN MISSION ASSOCIATES — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INC — $10,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $3,000 · International
Education$1,349,009Other$195,000International$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $1,074,002 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $140,004 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $125,003 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTaos Sports Associates Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robinson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph