Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert J Woodward Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$334kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%The Pennsylvania University: $2k → 10%Penn State Behrend: $2k → 15%Penn State Fayette: $2k → 17%Hannah Spurrell: $2k → 16%Lakya Jackson: $2k → 13%Chase Barrett: $2k → 12%Joshua Wood: $2k → 16%Aliyah Jackson: $2k → 10%University of Wisconsin Eau Claire: $2k → 12%Savannah Wright: $2k → 19%University of Southern Indiana: $2k → 15%Madeline Brinkman: $2k → 16%Jack Warren: $2k → 10%Madison Sherrick: $2k → 12%Logan Gossett: $2k → 12%Ty Pangborn: $2k → 13%Emily Rode: $2k → 13%Paige Brinkman: $2k → 14%Wittenberg University: $2k → 15%Annika Herrera Castro: $2k → 15%William Bartlett: $2k → 16%Case Western Reserve University: $2k → 17%Brayden Kaufman: $2k → 22%West Virginia University: $2k → 19%Marshall University: $2k → 19%Illinois State University: $2k → 11%Rock Valley College: $2k → 15%Dylan Bencivengo: $2k → 29%United States Naval Academy: $3k → 6%Eastern Kentucky University: $2k → 16%Tessa Childress: $2k → 18%Ashland Community & Technical College: $2k → 18%Owen Clark: $2k → 16%Lansing Community College: $2k → 16%The Ohio State University at Newark: $2k → 10%Miami University: $2k → 12%Gavin Mathews: $2k → 12%Rhodes State College: $2k → 13%The University of Dayton: $2k → 14%Callie Pangborn: $2k → 15%Jack Ruebensaal: $2k → 22%Jenna Rode: $2k → 12%Benjamin Brinkman: $2k → 22%Alexis Gossett: $2k → 12%Cade Warren: $2k → 22%Logan Tolliver: $2k → 15%Vanessa Chilcoat: $2k → 15%William Warren: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Robert J Woodward Education Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 50%.

The Robert J Woodward Education Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 53 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
41

Total granted

$256k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+27%

Still filing today

9%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
4
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
5
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
6
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
7
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
11
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
12
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital University; the most unlike its peers is Case Western Reserve University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+95 more: $320,750 · Other+95 moreCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationOtterbein University: $3,000 · EducationOHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $1,500 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education
Other$320,750Education$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert J Woodward Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert J Woodward Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert J Woodward Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph