Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert & Dorothy Leese Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Animals$128kHealth$19kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$100
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY$20,000
THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT$10,000
NATIONAL ARTHRITIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000
PETSMART CHARITIES$5,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PETSMART CHARITIES EIN 93-1140967: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT EIN 20-1407520: $3k → 12%NATIONAL ARTHRITIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%HSI ( HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL) EIN 52-1769464: $5k → 14%K9S FOR WARRIORS: $5k → 6%THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT: $10k → 9%ORCA CONSERVANCY EIN 91-1742694: $1k → 9%LIFE CENTER RAINIER FOOD BANK EIN 91-0579229: $5k → 9%CENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH EIN 91-1334319: $2k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR EIN 13-4148824: $100 → 7%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST EIN 52-1521276: $2k → 10%PETSMART CHARITIES EIN 93-1140967: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT EIN 20-1407520: $2k → 12%NATIONAL ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION EIN 95-6043953: $2k → 10%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE EIN 13-1837442: $1k → 17%K9S FOR WARRIORS EIN 27-5219467: $1k → 6%WHALES SANCTUARY PROJECT EIN 81-2276219: $5k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER EIN 23-7156071: $1k → 9%PRISON PET PARTNERSHIP EIN 91-1487894: $1k → 9%CENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH EIN 91-1334319: $2k → 10%DISABLED VETERANS CHARITABLE TRUST EIN 52-1521276: $1k → 10%PETSMART CHARITIES: $5k → 11%ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION EIN 95-6043953: $1k → 10%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2k → 17%THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT EIN 81-2276219: $5k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY EIN 91-0577128: $25k → 9%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA EIN 91-1792864: $1k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY EIN 91-0577128: $22k → 9%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION EIN 91-1792864: $1k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CA
UT
NE
KY
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 5 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$95k
$24k

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
AnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY EIN 91-0577128
    2× · 2020–2021 · $46k
  • TW
    THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +389%
  • PC
    PETSMART CHARITIES EIN 93-1140967
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFE CENTER RAINIER FOOD BANK EIN 91-0579229
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HH
    HSI ( HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL) EIN 52-1769464
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION EIN 95-6043953
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY EIN 91-0577128: $46,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY EIN 91-0577128HUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTYPETSMART CHARITIES EIN 93-1140967: $20,000 · OtherPETSMART CHARITIES EIN 93-1140967LIFE CENTER RAINIER FOOD BANK EIN 91-0579229: $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL ARTHRITIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherHSI ( HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL) EIN 52-1769464: $5,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT EIN 20-1407520: $4,500 · Other+14 more: $18,000 · Other+14 moreTHE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE WHALE SANCTUARY P…PETSMART CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · AnimalsPETSMART CHARITIES IN…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INCCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · Health
Other$123,500Animals$30,000Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT: $20,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert & Dorothy Leese Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert & Dorothy Leese Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert & Dorothy Leese’s filings →

More from the funding graph