Skip to content
The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
64
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.4MInternational$84kPhilanthropy$16kEducation$11kHuman Services$10kHealth$5kCivil Rights$4kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k58 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$1,270
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD AT STOCKTON INC$54,510
CHABAD AT THE SHORE INC$42,725
CHABAD SYNAGOGUES INC$36,000
CONGREGATION FRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE$14,300
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SPRINGFIELD$14,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$10,000
THE MITZVA FUND$9,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE MIAMI$6,370
YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH$6,000
MAMAN NONPROFIT$5,100
CHABAD OF MONTCLAIR$5,000
CHABAD OF MILL VALLEY$5,000
HAGESHER HABAYITA THE BRIDGE HOME$5,000
KINGSTON MIVKVA INC$5,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF WEST BOYNTON AND WEST LAKE WORTH$4,320
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%NEEMAN FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%A TIME: $700 → 20%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI: $660 → 15%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%ATIME: $260 → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
NV
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 70 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
80

Total granted

$1.4M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+29%

Still filing today

24%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +36%
  • JF
    JEM FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $6k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRIDGE HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • ZO
    ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
11
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
12
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Jmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/50
Grantees still filing
27/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD SYNAGOGUES INC: $451,200 · OtherCHABAD SYNAGOGUES INCCHABAD AT STOCKTON INC: $268,810 · OtherCHABAD AT STOCKTON INCCHABAD AT THE SHORE INC: $204,465 · OtherCHABAD AT THE SHORE INCCONGREGATION FRIENDS OF REFUGEES OF EASTERN EUROPE: $64,600 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SPRINGFIELD: $60,000 · Other+134 more: $417,877 · Other+134 moreAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $11,220 · ReligionJEM FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 · ReligionFriendship Circle New Jersey Inc: $5,136 · ReligionESHEL: $5,100 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 · ReligionKingston Mikva Inc: $5,000 · ReligionMEVER LAYAM: $5,000 · Religion+9 more: $4,720 · ReligionPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $9,760 · PhilanthropyAmerican Friends of Yeshivas Temimei Darech: $4,250 · PhilanthropyJMP Foundation: $1,880 · PhilanthropyDAILY GIVING INC: $1,194 · PhilanthropyYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $1,100 · Philanthropy+4 more: $1,209 · PhilanthropyMaman Nonprofit: $5,100 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $2,950 · InternationalFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $1,000 · InternationalHagesher Habayita - The Bridge Home: $5,000 · Public BenefitCHAYAL EL CHAYAL INC: $2,595 · Public BenefitTHE NE'EMAN FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,220 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $960 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI INC: $660 · Human Services+1 more: $180 · Human ServicesMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,270 · EducationRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $1,500 · EducationFriends of Lubavitch Inc: $250 · Education
Other$1,466,952Religion$46,776Philanthropy$29,393International$9,050Public Benefit$7,595Human Services$6,020Education$4,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $11,220 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $9,760 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $6,870 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEM FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFriendship Circle New Jersey Inc: $5,136 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMaman Nonprofit: $5,100 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetESHEL: $5,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKingston Mikva Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEVER LAYAM: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshivas Temimei Darech: $4,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMitzvah Fund Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $2,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAYAL EL CHAYAL INC: $2,595 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,270 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJMP Foundation: $1,880 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHABAD AT THE MEDICAL CENTERS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAIS SCHNEUR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,220 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY GIVING INC: $1,194 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaimonides Hebrew Day School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALGEMEINER INC: $840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoul Space Global Inc: $770 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI INC: $660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI ISRAEL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL TORAH INC: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaon Noam Inc: $401 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $378 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC: $360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAMPLIGHTERS YESHIVAH: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS MENACHEM YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASHERT NOW FOUNDATION: $360 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Miami Hebrew Academy: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Lubavitch Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS CHARITY FUND FOR ISRAEL: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Circle New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds Maman Nonprofit ↗
  • Who funds ESHEL ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Hagesher Habayita - The Bridge Home ↗
  • Who funds Kingston Mikva Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nash Charity Foundati…Jewish Communal FundHp Foundation IncThe Ojc FundLavie Shterna Popack …Barber Family Foundat…Lets Make It Happen N…Jla Charitable Founda…The Ejnra FoundationRebbe's Partnership F…Ain Sof Charitable Fo…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Nash Charity Foundation IncNJ45.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Hp Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Lavie Shterna Popack Family Foundat · Barber Family Foundation · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Jla Charitable Foundation · The Ejnra Foundation · Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Ain Sof Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Mitzvah Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rapoport Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home