Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Propst Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$564k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MInternational$640kYouth Development$474kHealth$401kArts & Culture$340kReligion$285kFood & Nutrition$183kEducation$153kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $324k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEARNING CENTER$57,911
MANNA HOUSE$54,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH ALABAMA$54,000
KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION$54,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTH ALABAMA$54,000
BIG OAK RANCH$50,000
VILLAGE OF PROMISE$40,000
WELLSTONE$25,000
ACE THE STIGMA$25,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
HISTORIC HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION$15,000
HEALS INC$15,000
HUNTSVILLE MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
THERAPY PARTNERS INC$10,000
HOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $40k → 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $120k → 13%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $25k → 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $85k → 13%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $25k → 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%VILLAGE OF PROMISE: $20k → 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $50k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $35k → 13%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $71k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $64k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $59k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $54k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $43k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 30 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
5

Total granted

$3.8M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+17%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    HUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $640k · revenue +79%
  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $540k · revenue +105%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $459k · revenue +165%

Funded once

  • HL
    HUNTSVILLE LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • NH
    New Hope Children's Clinic
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • HG
    HUNTSVILLE GOT YOUR SIX
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
2
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
3
Alabama Public Health Association Inc

The alabama public health association, inc., is an association of individuals and organizations interested in public health in alabama. the mission of the association is to link individuals and organizations in addressing public health…

Health
4
Northeast Alabama Health Services Inc

Northeast alabama health services, inc. is a non-profit corporation, established to provide quality health care services to the underserved populations of northeast alabama and contiguous areas regardless of language, financial, or…

Health
5
Houston County Volunteer Medical Clinic Inc

The organization works to provide free primary medical care to working, lower-income, uninsured citizens in Houston County, GA.

Health
6
Huntsville-Madison County Senior Center Inc

Enable senior citizens to maintain independence

—
7
Huntington County Humane Society Inc

The huntington county humane society exists to protect and provide shelter for animals and to encourage the humane treatment of all animals in huntington county.

Animals
8
Greater Huntsville Humane Society Inc

Promote animal care and placement

Animals
9
Gadsden-Etowah Habitat for Humanity

Construction of Residential Housing for Low-income families

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
11
United Way of Northwest Alabama

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community

Philanthropy
12
Central North Al Health Service Inc

Provide primary health care to mostly low-income and underserved persons.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of North Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Twickenham Historic Preservation District Associat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG OAK RANCH INC: $540,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INCKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $426,762 · Human ServicesKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATIONVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $110,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATEDLINCOLN VILLAGE MINISTRIES: $130,000 · OtherLINCOLN VILLAGE MINISTRIESTHE LEARNING CENTER: $107,911 · OtherTHE LEARNING CENTERHARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $105,000 · OtherHARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INCACE THE STIGMA: $70,000 · OtherACE THE STIGMAHUNTSVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER: $65,000 · OtherHUNTSVILLE ANIMAL SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSECOND MILE: $55,000 · OtherSECOND MILEFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherRUSSEL HILL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherTWICKENHAM HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT ASSOCIAT: $39,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+12 more: $168,673 · Other+12 moreHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $639,764 · PhilanthropyHUNTSVILLE DREAM CE…+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $458,915 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …WELLSTONE INC: $155,000 · HealthTHERAPY PARTNERS INC: $80,000 · HealthHEALS INC: $40,000 · Health+3 more: $11,000 · HealthMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $135,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureFood Bank of North Alabama Inc: $183,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,076,762Other$981,084Philanthropy$654,764Youth Development$458,915Health$286,000Arts & Culture$205,000Food & Nutrition$183,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $639,764 over 9y, 16% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $540,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $458,915 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetKIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION: $426,762 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFood Bank of North Alabama Inc: $183,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWELLSTONE INC: $155,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE: $135,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetVILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $110,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $105,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHERAPY PARTNERS INC: $80,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetHISTORIC HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 9y, 7.5% of budgetRUSSEL HILL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHEALS INC: $40,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTWICKENHAM HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT ASSOCIAT: $39,500 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetA NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDowntown Huntsville Inc: $23,679 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDowntown Huntsville Charitable Fund: $10,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetNORTH ALABAMA HOMEBUILDING ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNew Hope Children's Clinic: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds KIDS TO LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of North Alabama Inc ↗
  • Who funds WELLSTONE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THERAPY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HUNTSVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSEL HILL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds TWICKENHAM HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT ASSOCIAT ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Huntsville Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Huntsville Charitable Fund ↗
  • Who funds NORTH ALABAMA HOMEBUILDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Children's Clinic ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL40.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · Parker Griffith Family Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Beard-Young Family Foundation · Wallace E Kirkpatrick Family Foundation · Alpha Foundation · John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation · The I3 Cares Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Ashburn Family Foundation · Stender Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Propst Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Propst Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Propst Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Propst Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Propst’s filings →

    More from the funding graph