Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

The Piedmont Foundation

Supporting organization for the piedmont environmental council (pec), a 501(c)3 public charity.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$1.7M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$24,975
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,620,077
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$28M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations The Piedmont Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$1.7M50%
FY20244$1.7M50%
FY20236$881k83%
FY20223$1.8M67%
FY20212$712k50%
FY20201$656k0%
FY20191$715k0%
FY20181$714k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$9.4M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Piedmont Environmental Council$9,171,158927%
Culpeper Soil and Water Conservation District$50,0001n/a
American Battlefield Trust$50,00010%
Happy Hammers$27,4001n/a
Virginia Outdoors Foundation$25,0001n/a
Town of Washington$24,9751n/a
Friends of the Rappahannock$20,97611%
McCarty Contracting Company$20,0032n/a
Mosby Land Management$15,0002n/a
Virginia LLC$10,5001n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of The Piedmont Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Piedmont Environmental Council$9,171,158927%
Culpeper Soil and Water Conservation District$50,0001n/a
American Battlefield Trust$50,00010%
Happy Hammers$27,4001n/a
Virginia Outdoors Foundation$25,0001n/a
Town of Washington$24,9751n/a
Friends of the Rappahannock$20,97611%
McCarty Contracting Company$20,0032n/a
Mosby Land Management$15,0002n/a
Virginia LLC$10,5001n/a
Clarke County Education Foundation Inc$10,00013%
Edward J C Burke Surveying LLC$8,2501n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($10k), not named here.

Compare The Piedmont Foundation with peer funders

About The Piedmont Foundation

How much does The Piedmont Foundation give?
The Piedmont Foundation reported 4 itemized grants totaling $1,663,302, out of $1,864,198 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Piedmont Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (100%).
Who are The Piedmont Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Piedmont Environmental Council ($9.2M), Culpeper Soil and Water Conservation District ($50k), American Battlefield Trust ($50k).
Does The Piedmont Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Piedmont Foundation based?
The Piedmont Foundation is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Piedmont’s filings →

More from the funding graph