Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

$909k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$1.7MEnvironment$316kScience & Tech$163kEducation$158k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $448,086 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $909,068 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $460,982 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$167,225
Median grant
3
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METRO (OREGON ZOO)$251,861
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$167,225
EARTHSPAN$29,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BSU FOUNDATION: $259k → 8%UC Santa Cruz Foundation: $112k → 13%University of North Texas: $8k → 8%METRO (OREGON ZOO): $297k → 12%Conservation Science Global Inc: $52k → 10%EARTHSPAN: $45k → 16%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $167k → 8%METRO (OREGON ZOO): $252k → 12%Conservation Science Global Inc: $20k → 10%Earthspan: $30k → 16%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $113k → 8%METRO (OREGON ZOO): $238k → 12%Conservation Science Global Inc: $10k → 10%EARTHSPAN: $29k → 16%Boise State University: $51k → 8%Metro (Oregon Zoo): $119k → 12%Earthspan: $25k → 16%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $46k → 8%Metro (Oregon Zoo): $112k → 12%Earthspan: $25k → 16%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%Metro (Oregon Zoo): $100k → 12%EARTHSPAN: $25k → 16%METRO (OREGON ZOO): $98k → 12%EarthSpan: $20k → 16%Earthspan: $20k → 16%EARTHSPAN: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $340k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $104k to organizations and $236k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$101k · 30% · 1 grant · 42 people

Stated purpose: HAITI GRANT RIDGEWAY HAWK (ACSEH) · CONSERVATION RESEARCH · CONFERENCE AWARD

South Asia$76k · 22% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: INDIA RESEARCH GRANT · HIMALAYAN RAPTORS · WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Sub-Saharan Africa$69k · 20% · 2 grants · 48 people

Stated purpose: KENYA BIRDS OF PREY/RAPTOR RESEARCH · RAPTOR RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION · RAPTOR/BIRDS OF PREY RESEARCH

South America$61k · 18% · 33 people

Stated purpose: ANDEAN CONDOR · CONFERENCE AWARDS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$17k · 5% · 3 people

Stated purpose: VULTURE STUDIES · CONFERENCE AWARD

Russia and Neighboring States$8k · 2% · 1 person

Stated purpose: KAZATSTAN STUDIES

North America (Canada and Mexico)$5k · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: RAPTOR STUDIES

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: VULTURE RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 4 repeat orgs$431k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +135% since the first grant, against +81% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$431k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%
+81%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OZ
    OREGON ZOO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M
  • BS
    Boise State University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $387k
  • E
    EARTHSPAN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $234k · revenue +96% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $259k · revenue +81%
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $112k · revenue +8%
  • CS
    Conservation Science Global Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $52k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OREGON ZOO — $1,215,746 · OtherOREGON ZOOBoise State University — $387,077 · OtherBoise State University+2 more — $60,144 · OtherBoise State University Foundation Inc — $258,989 · EducationBoise State Univer…UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $111,830 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUN…EARTHSPAN — $234,000 · EnvironmentEARTHSPANCONSERVATION SCIENCE GLOBAL — $30,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION …
Other$1,662,967Education$370,819Environment$264,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $258,989 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEARTHSPAN — $234,000 over 9y, 59% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $111,830 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCONSERVATION SCIENCE GLOBAL — $30,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc
  • Who funds EARTHSPAN
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SCIENCE GLOBAL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Peregrine Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Conservation Science Global27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph