· Public charity
Parentchild Inc
Our mission is to ensure that all children regardless of their race, socio-economic status, or zip code have equal possibilities from the start.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $301k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $677k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | $961,169 |
| MASA-MEXED INC | $411,000 |
| FIRST 5 SANTA CLARA COUNTY | $350,000 |
| NEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER | $272,765 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY | $175,000 |
| ALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION | $135,597 |
| THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC | $113,650 |
| NASSAU BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| RISING GROUND INC | $71,765 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE MD | $56,414 |
| BRIGHTSIDE UP | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONONDAGA NY | $39,812 |
| FAMILIES FIRST IN CABARRUS COUNTY | $37,500 |
| FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF FLORIDA INC | $31,000 |
| PEABODY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $494k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPublic Health Management Corporation8× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +391%
- MIMASA-MEXED INC7× · 2018–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +205% · 29% of their budget
- TCTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +109%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $141k
- FSFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $107k · revenue +50%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONONDAGA NYone grant, 2024 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…
Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
The mission of children's friend and service (the organization) is to be the innovative leader in improving the well-being and healthy development of rhode island's most vulnerable young children. they accomplish this by providing flexible…
To strengthen the well-being and development of families and individuals through professional human services programs, including therapy, counseling, education, special assistance, and advocacy.
Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.
To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…
Northside center for child development day school (the "school") operates a comprehensive treatment center dedicated to meeting the social, emotional and educational needs of children and their families, principally through the operation…
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Csc prepares young children and their families to succeed in learning and life through innovative, comprehensive, leading edge services.
To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.
Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fall River Educators' Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Public Health Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds MASA-MEXED INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Bilingual Learning Center ↗
- Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW SONG COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CORE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds Brockton Educational Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE UP INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCARORA INTERMEDIATE UNIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE ACTING IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NASSAU BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE NY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Metro North Regional Employment Board · National Energy Education Development Project Inc · Eos Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Parentchild Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Triumph Inc — 89% of income from government
- New North Citizens Council Inc — 75% of income from government
- Child Care of the Berkshires Inc — 59% of income from government
- Self Help Inc — 27% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- People Acting in Community Endeavors Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.