Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pakula Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$40kRecreation & Sports$23kEnvironment$20kHealth$20kCrime & Legal$20kInternational$20kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$442k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOM$5,000
SAVE THE SOUND INC$5,000
COLUMBIA COLLEGE FUND$5,000
ANGEL VIEW$5,000
NORWALK GRASS ROOT TENNIS$5,000
STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION$5,000
FAMILY RE-ENTRY$5,000
PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM$2,500
SWIM ACROSS AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGEL VIEW: $5k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $5k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $5k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 9 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$153k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SAVE THE SOUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +40%
  • STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • AV
    Angel View Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • SA
    Swim Across America Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
Families of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Dba Cure Sma

Our mission is to drive research for treatments and a cure for sma, and to support and empower everyone impacted by sma today.

Health
4
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
5
Science Foundation Arizona

Science foundation arizona's mission is to diversify arizona's economy by investing in scientific and engineering research linked to industry needs and investing in education to create a work force with 21st centrury skills.

Philanthropy
6
Grounds for Sculpture Inc

Grounds For Sculpture combines art and beckoning spaces to welcome, surprise, and engage all visitors in the artists act of invention.

Arts & Culture
7
Waterstep Inc

Waterstep focuses on providing safe water, sanitation, and hygiene solutions to communities in need around the world. its mission is rooted in the belief that safe water is a basic human right and a critical foundation for health,…

Youth Development
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
11
Panorama

To be a community that supports its members through the various stages of aging, from inspiring individual enrichment and overall wellness to offering security and uncompromising care, allowing each resident the opportunity to thrive.

Human Services
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundation of Palm Springs Unified School District; the most unlike its peers is Palm Springs Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORWALK GRASS ROOT TENNIS: $22,500 · OtherNORWALK GRASS ROOT TENNISFAMILY REENTRY INC: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY REENTRY INCCOLUMBIA COLLEGE FUND: $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGE FUNDAMERICAN FRIEND NEVE SHALOM: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIEND NEVE SHALOMAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOM: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMSAVE THE SOUND: $20,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationSTEPPINGSTONE …Angel View Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesAngel View IncPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSwim Across America Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$82,500Environment$20,000Education$20,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAngel View Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY REENTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pakula Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pakula Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Steppingstone Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pakula’s filings →

More from the funding graph