Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oriska Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$178kFood & Nutrition$125kEducation$108kHousing & Shelter$79kInternational$62kReligion$20kCrime & Legal$10kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food for the Poor$30,000
Catholic Charities$10,000
The Salvation Army$10,000
Star of Hope$10,000
CATCH Foundation$10,000
Open Door Mission$10,000
Blessed Sacrament Church$5,000
FINCA$5,000
Doctors Without Borders$5,000
The Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament$3,000
Easter Seals Greater Houston Inc$3,000
The Posse Foundation$3,000
ANNAM Community Development Corporation$3,000
CARE$3,000
Oxfam America$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Open Door Mission: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
AR
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$585k · 17 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$585k
$16k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    C A T C H FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $96k · revenue +55%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +20%
  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TM
    Thurgood Marshall School of Law
    4× · 2019–2022 · $10k
  • VC
    Vietnamese Community Center
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • SM
    St Mary's Magdalene Parish
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
2
Oxfam America Action Fund Inc

Oxfam america action fund (oaaf) is a partner organization to oxfam america. oaaf strives to end global poverty, hunger, and social injustice through legislative lobbying and political advocacy.

Civil Rights
3
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
4
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
5
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
8
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
9
Ochsner Health System

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…

—
10
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
11
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is C a T C H Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Salvation Army: $60,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $60,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCThe Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament: $13,500 · OtherThe Sisters of the Blessed Sacram…Heifer International: $11,500 · OtherHeifer InternationalThurgood Marshall School of Law: $10,000 · OtherThurgood Marshall School of LawNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $7,500 · OtherCAF Red Tail Squadron: $7,500 · Other+5 more: $10,500 · Other+5 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $125,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,500 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $11,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND R…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $9,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCC A T C H FOUNDATION: $95,500 · EducationC A T C H FOUNDATIONTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDATION…STAR OF HOPE MISSION: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE M…ANNAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA TION: $18,500 · Housing & ShelterANNAM COMMUNIT…Open Door Mission: $55,000 · Human ServicesOpen Door …EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC: $8,000 · Health
Other$180,500International$175,000Education$108,000Housing & Shelter$78,500Human Services$55,000Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetC A T C H FOUNDATION: $95,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOpen Door Mission: $55,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetANNAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA TION: $18,500 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds C A T C H FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Door Mission ↗
  • Who funds ANNAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA TION ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oriska Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oriska Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Oriska Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Oriska Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oriska’s filings →

More from the funding graph