· Public charity
The Ojc Fund
To maintain a donor advised fund by honoring our commitment to fundholders by providing services to make their charitable giving administratively efficient, and personally rewarding.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k670 grants · $4.9M
- $10k–50k1642 grants · $40M
- $50k–250k1036 grants · $117M
- $250k+366 grants · $287M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEREN MUGEIN IMOISHEYA | $10,695,970 |
| CONG NOAM ELIMELECH LIZENSK | $10,162,881 |
| CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN | $5,219,340 |
| TOIREM | $5,155,560 |
| VYAZREIM INC | $4,423,360 |
| CHASDEI MESHILAM | $4,185,851 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF B NAI LEVY FOUNDATION | $3,567,507 |
| CHAYIM VCHESED INC | $3,396,663 |
| BINYAN YERUSHLAIM | $3,035,208 |
| UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF KIRYAS JOEL INC | $2,948,408 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC | $2,676,087 |
| CONGREGATION BEIS AHARN | $2,442,398 |
| YAAZORU INC | $2,430,720 |
| UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY TORAH VYIRAH INC | $2,317,527 |
| CONGREGATION YITEV LAV DERETZ YISROEL | $2,314,140 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $17.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
1943 repeat relationships: 1835 still active in FY2025, 108 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CVCHAYIM V CHESED9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +139%
- VIVYAZREIM INC5× · 2021–2025 · $8.6M · revenue +274%
- YIYAAZORU INC5× · 2021–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +81% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- YSYAM SHLOMO INCone grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
- CHCONGREGATION HAGRAone grant, 2022 · $500k
- JLJEWISH LEARNING CENTER-OHR MENACHEM MENDEL INCone grant, 2022 · $495k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
How this is measured
369 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 369 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Vyazreim Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Hf Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Ojc Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ojc Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ojc’s filings →