Skip to content
The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$628k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$17MEducation$5.1MScience & Tech$300kArts & Culture$230kHuman Services$198kAnimals$135kFood & Nutrition$125kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+2 grants · $978k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$627,800
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$350,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$200,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$175,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$175,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - BIOCHEMISTRY$175,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$175,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$175,000
Individual grant recipient$175,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$150,000
REGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO$150,000
Individual grant recipient$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$120,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LEARNING ALLY: $2k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $2k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 21 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$22M
$200k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +39%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +36%
  • NH
    Neighborhood House Association
    5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - ARTHRITIS
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTI: $10,790,340 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH - CVRTIREGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCO: $3,650,000 · OtherREGENTS UC SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $2,927,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHIndividual grant recipient: $2,180,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF UTAH - BIOCHEMISTRY: $875,000 · Other+10 more: $1,874,000 · Other+10 moreUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $125,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $100,000 · HealthNeighborhood House Association: $90,000 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesCANDID: $7,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · International
Other$22,297,640Arts & Culture$165,000Health$100,000Human Services$94,000Philanthropy$7,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $90,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKQED INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nora Eccles Treadwell’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home