Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The New Jersey Committee of the Garden Club of America

Preservation of significant garden clubs and to provide financial support for college students through scholarships.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Education$57kEnvironment$46kOther$55k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$306k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARDEN CLUB OF SOMERSET HILLS$16,075
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$12,500
RUMSON GARDEN CLUB$6,773
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GARDEN CLUB OF MORRISTOWN: $8k → 4%GARDEN CLUB OF SOMERSET HILLS: $16k → 5%RUMSON GARDEN CLUB: $7k → 6%GARDEN CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD: $15k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $13k → 8%GARDEN CLUB OF PRINCETON: $10k → 11%SHORT HILLS GARDEN CLUB: $10k → 16%GARDEN CLUB OF MADISON: $10k → 4%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 8%GARDEN CLUB OF PRINCETON: $10k → 11%SHORT HILLS GARDEN CLUB: $10k → 16%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%STONYBROOK GC OF PRINCETON: $15k → 11%SHORT HILLS GARDEN CLUB: $7k → 16%STONYBROOK GC OF PRINCETON: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$102k · 4 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$102k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +8%
  • SH
    Short Hills Garden Club
    3× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue -4%
  • SB
    STONY BROOK GARDEN CLUB OF PRINCETON INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • GC
    GARDEN CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -27% · 41% of their budget
  • GC
    GARDEN CLUB OF MADISON INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • GC
    GARDEN CLUB OF MORRISTOWN
    one grant, 2021 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,900 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONShort Hills Garden Club — $26,500 · EducationShort Hills Garden ClubSTONY BROOK GARDEN CLUB OF PRINCETON INC — $25,000 · OtherSTONY BROOK GARDEN CLUB OF PRINCETON IN…GARDEN CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD INC — $15,000 · OtherGARDEN CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD INCGARDEN CLUB OF MORRISTOWN — $7,759 · OtherGARDEN CLUB OF MORRISTOWNRUMSON GARDEN CLUB — $6,773 · OtherRUMSON GARDEN CLUBGarden Club of Princeton — $19,500 · EnvironmentGarden Club of PrincetonGARDEN CLUB OF SOMERSET HILLS — $16,075 · EnvironmentGARDEN CLUB OF SOMERSET HILLSGARDEN CLUB OF MADISON INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentGARDEN CLUB OF MADISON INC
Education$57,400Other$54,532Environment$45,575

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetShort Hills Garden Club — $26,500 over 3y, 19% of budgetGarden Club of Princeton — $19,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetGARDEN CLUB OF SOMERSET HILLS — $16,075 over 2y, 53% of budgetGARDEN CLUB OF ENGLEWOOD INC — $15,000 over 1y, 41% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The New Jersey Committee of the Garden Club of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The New Jersey Committee of the Garden Club of America?

Find your warmest path to The New Jersey Committee of the Garden Club of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph