Skip to content

· Public charity

The New Hampshire Fisher Cats Charitable Foundation

Charitable orgainzation dedicated to bettering the lives of new hampshire youth

$60k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$173kEducation$126kCrime & Legal$65kArts & Culture$43k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $15,856, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,106 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,856
Median grant
1
States reached
$182k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH$15,856
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM: $15k → 17%HOPE FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RECOVERY: $30k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOLARS: $30k → 7%TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM: $14k → 17%HOPE FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RECOVERY: $22k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOLARS: $30k → 7%TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM: $14k → 17%HOPE FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RECOVERY: $11k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOLARS: $30k → 7%THE GRANITE STATE CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $31k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOLARS: $30k → 7%THE GRANITE STATE CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $21k → 7%THE GRANITE STATE CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $12k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT DARTMOUTH (CHAD): $33k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT DARTMOUTH (CHAD): $30k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT DARTMOUTH (CHAD): $30k → 7%DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH: $16k → 7%DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$406k · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$406k
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire College & University Council
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +103%
  • TG
    THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +279%
  • TW
    TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $43k · revenue +78%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    3/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $93,123 · HealthMary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalFRIENDS OF RECOVERY NH: $63,602 · HealthFRIENDS OF RECOVERY NHDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $21,364 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock HealthNew Hampshire College & University Council: $120,000 · OtherNew Hampshire College & Universit…THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $64,602 · Crime & LegalTHE GRANITE STATE …TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC: $43,037 · Arts & CultureTED WILLIAMS…
    Health$178,089Other$120,000Crime & Legal$64,602Arts & Culture$43,037

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Hampshire College & University Council: $120,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $93,123 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $64,602 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF RECOVERY NH: $63,602 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC: $43,037 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $21,364 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The New Hampshire Fisher Cats Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The New Hampshire Fisher Cats Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      1get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The New Hampshire Fisher Cats Charitable Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The New Hampshire Fisher Cats Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $27k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on New Hampshire Fisher Cats’ filings →

      More from the funding graph