Skip to content
The Neuhar Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Neuhar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$292kInternational$168kEducation$24kArts & Culture$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$46,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL C$30,000
LARGER THAN LIFE - LA FAMILY$10,000
American Friends of the Arthur Rubi$5,760
WE SPARK INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WE SPARK INC: $2k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT: $1k → 9%WE SPARK INC: $1k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT: $1k → 9%WE SPARK INC: $1k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT: $1k → 9%WESPARK INC: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$293k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+41%

Still filing today

56%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL C
    4× · 2022–2025 · $94k
  • LT
    Larger Than Life - LA Family
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue -49%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER AT TEL HASHOMER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $58k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $37k · revenue +112%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -40%
  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
7
Tel Aviv Museum's American Friends Inc

To provide support for the tel aviv museum located in israel

Philanthropy
8
Aviv Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—
12
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Avon Products Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL C: $94,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER AT TEL HASHOMER INC: $58,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER…American Friends of the Arthur Rubi: $11,560 · OtherAmerican Friends of the Arthur Rubi+5 more: $11,000 · Other+5 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $148,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCLarger Than Life - LA Family: $90,000 · InternationalLarger Than Life - LA Famil…American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $23,500 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Tel Avi…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $37,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWESPARK INC: $4,200 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT INC CO ARMEL LESLIE: $3,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$174,560Philanthropy$148,000International$118,500Health$38,000Human Services$7,200Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $148,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLarger Than Life - LA Family: $90,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $23,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESPARK INC: $4,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT INC CO ARMEL LESLIE: $3,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVON PRODUCTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Neuhar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Neuhar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neuhar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home