· Public charity
The National Right to Work Committee
The committee is a nonprofit, tax-exempt, educational-lobbying organization opposing compulsory unionism in all its forms and supporting the right of all people to obtain and hold a job without being forced to join a labor union or pay compulsory union dues.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $203k
- $250k+2 grants · $696k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONSERVATIVE ACTION LEAGUE | $366,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND CITIZENS RIGHT TO WORK INC | $330,000 |
| WESTERN STATES RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE INC | $152,500 |
| MID AMERICA RIGHT TO WORK | $50,000 |
| MID ATLANTIC RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACONSERVATIVE ACTION LEAGUE8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +9% · 100% of their budget
- NENEW ENGLAND CITIZENS FOR RIGHT TO WORK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +22% · 48% of their budget
- MRMID-AMERICA RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE7× · 2017–2024 · $613k · revenue +76% · 99% of their budget
Funded once
- MFMISSOURIANS FOR FREEDOM TO WORKone grant, 2018 · $765k · 52% of their budget
- AFAMERICANS FOR LIMITED GOVERNMENT INCone grant, 2020 · $117k · revenue -91%
- DRDELAWARE RIGHT TO WORK EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2018 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Labor Union
Advocacy of policies to support Nebraskans.
Freedom to work was formed to support proposition a right to work in the state of missouri.
To inform and educate ibew local unions.
To provide labor representation to members.
To ensure that working class people are educated on their voting rights. The coalition engages in mobilization and educational information sessions to ensure that all workers voices are heard.
The organization is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
To provide collective bargaining representation to members.
Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay
Conduct research and training to guide conservatives through the digital transformation of politics and advocating for the increased adoption of digital communications technology by candidates and elected officials.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-America Right to Work Committee and the most unlike its peers is Americans for Limited Government Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONSERVATIVE ACTION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds WESTERN STATES RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND CITIZENS FOR RIGHT TO WORK INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURIANS FOR FREEDOM TO WORK ↗
- Who funds MID-AMERICA RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds MID-ATLANTIC RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR LIMITED GOVERNMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COALITIONS FOR AMERICA ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The National Right to Work Committee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.