Skip to content

· Public charity

The National Press Foundation Inc

To increase journalists knowledge of complex issues to improve public understanding and to encourage excellence in journalism through awards and programs.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$61kArts & Culture$43kHealth$6kPublic Benefit$5kEducation$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,625, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,912 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $149,287 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,625
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WUNC Public Radio LLC$5,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Bureau for International Reporting Inc: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
GA

Grants abroad, by region: $40k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$12k · 30% · 6 people

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

South Asia$12k · 30% · 6 people

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$6k · 15% · 3 people

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

South America$4k · 10% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 5% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

Middle East and North Africa$2k · 5% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

Central America and the Caribbean$2k · 5% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Training on reporting - rare diseases

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 3 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$30k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+61%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DN
    DETROIT NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP LP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k
  • WC
    WP Company LLC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $10k
  • MM
    MASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • BF
    BUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +63% · 30% of their budget
  • SH
    SIJ Holdings
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • SN
    STATES NEWSROOMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIJ Holdings: $15,500 · OtherSIJ HoldingsDETROIT NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP LP: $10,000 · OtherDETROIT NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP LPWP Company LLC: $10,000 · OtherWP Company LLCTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL: $8,333 · OtherTHE WALL STREET JOURNALUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $5,625 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLMichael Kruse Inc: $5,000 · OtherMichael Kruse IncSolas Publications Inc: $5,000 · OtherSolas Publications IncSutton Impact Studio Inc: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherSTATES NEWSROOM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSTATES NEWSROOMMASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND I…NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INCBUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBUREAU FOR INTERNAT…HENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Education
Other$62,958Arts & Culture$27,500Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$5,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC: $20,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetSTATES NEWSROOM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC ↗
  • Who funds STATES NEWSROOM ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS MEDIA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The National Press Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The National Press Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Press’ filings →

    More from the funding graph