Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Naomi and James I Fitzgibbon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$17kYouth Development$11kRecreation & Sports$11kHuman Services$6kEducation$6kInternational$5kCommunity Improvement$5kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$249k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKY RIVER LITTLE LEAGUE$10,000
LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO$5,000
PATHWAYS FOR LIFE ACADEMY$2,000
MAROONERS$1,500
PROJECT CANIS$1,500
ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER CLEVE$1,000
REECE'S RAINBOW$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%REECE'S RAINBOW: $1k → 7%LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The River Academy

Our purpose is to partner with parents in educating their children to become the next generation of christian leaders equipped to shape culture through faithful, wise, and joyful christian living.

Education
2
Erie Rise Leadership Academy Charter School

To further education quality in Erie

Education
3
Rivers Edge Academy Charter School

Reach offers a holistic approach to student learning where parents have a voice. the vision is achieving academic excellence through personalized insutruction, and parent, teacher & community partnerships.

Education
4
River Valley Charter School

River valley charter school provides students in grades 7-12 with a rigorous, standards-based college preparatory program in a small school environment that allows for personal attention to each student and encourages strong family…

Education
5
Riverpointe Christian Academy

Rca provides education in an environment designed to develop the students abilities in christian character, academic acheivement, personal development, social responsibilities, & leadership qualities

Education
6
River of Life School

River of life school exists to provide a christ centered education to all children regardless of their socio-economic situation. river of life celebrates the diversity of the body of christ and equips children to serve god, people, and…

Education
7
Christian Life Academy Inc

Christian life academy supports christian families by providing a biblically based education that develops individual academic excellence. we seek to form young men and women who will know and serve the lord jesus christ with all their…

8
Lifeworks Community Action Inc

Lifeworks provides access to programs that fulfill our neighbors' immediate needs and delivers skills, tools and opportunities to establish economic security for themselves, their families and communities.

Human Services
9
Catholic Education Foundation Inc

The catholic education foundation is dedicated to the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville. the foundation advances its mission primarily through tuition assistance grants to families who cannot afford…

Education
10
St Francis Day School Inc

A private school providing an exceptional college preparatory program with a specialty in learning disabilities.

Education
11
Riverview Charter School

To provide a meaningful, hands-on learning experience in an active, engaged, and involved school.

Education
12
Riverway Learning Community

Riverway learning community is committed to the foundation of a more hopeful and enlightened future by the development of an environment that nurtures the growth of mind, body and spirit, both as individuals and as members of the larger…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifework Leadership Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Marooners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKY RIVER LITTLE LEAGUE — $10,000 · OtherROCKY RIVER LITTLE LEAGUECLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S — $10,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'SLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP INC — $5,000 · OtherLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP INCUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $5,000 · OtherUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INCPATHWAYS FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $4,000 · OtherPATHWAYS FOR LIFE ACADEMY INCEDGEWATER YACHT CLUB INC — $2,500 · OtherEDGEWATER YACHT CLUB INCPROJECT CANIS — $1,500 · OtherROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherTHE MAROONERS — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE MAROONERSST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK L…REECE'S RAINBOW INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesREECE'S RA…ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$40,500Recreation & Sports$8,000Health$7,000Human Services$6,000Philanthropy$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPATHWAYS FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEDGEWATER YACHT CLUB INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREECE'S RAINBOW INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Naomi and James I Fitzgibbon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Naomi and James I Fitzgibbon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Naomi and James I Fitzgibbon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph