Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union

The mission of the mount vernon ladies' association is to preserve, restore, and manage the estate of george washington to the highest standards and to educate visitors and people throughout the world about the life and legacies of george washington, so that his example of character and leadership will continue to inform and inspire…

$329k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $73,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $329,180 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $256,180 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$13,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$401M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$25,000
ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION$15,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$13,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS$10,000
POHICK CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE GILDER LERHMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $10k → 17%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $20k → 16%ROSEMONT PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $10k → 11%POHICK CHURCH: $10k → 6%MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $283k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $276k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $272k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%THE MOYAONE ASSOCIATION: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 80% of The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 4% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Unionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 3 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+10%

Still filing today

67%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $956k
  • AF
    ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue -33%
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • US
    USC School of Medicine Greenville
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +25%
  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University and the most unlike its peers is Rosemont Preservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $955,762 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · OtherACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC+4 more — $49,000 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $16,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $10,000 · EducationTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY — $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS — $10,000 · EducationRosemont Preservation Society — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,124,762Education$72,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosemont Preservation Society — $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOYAONE ASSOCIATION — $9,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Accokeek Foundation Inc100% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University11% of income from government
  • University of Hartford1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph