Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence.

$152M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$95M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.1BHousing & Shelter$1.4M
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,665,693
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$95,207,838
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$38,919,000
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$15,665,693
INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH$2,127,386
MSMC REALTY CORPORATION$291,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $171.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $27.4M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $25.7M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $24.4M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $23.3M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $21.2M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $19.0M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $15.7M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $14.6M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1B · 7 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$1.1B
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    8× · 2017–2024 · $748M · revenue +58%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $171M · revenue +90% · 41% of their budget
  • SN
    South Nassau Communities Hospital Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $125M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • BH
    BronxCare Health Systemsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
2
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
3
Mount Sinai Health Partners Pc

Mount sinai health partners, pc will provide outpatient care.

Health
4
New York Eye & Ear Infirmary

To provide patient care at the highest quality, most technologically advanced and consistent multidisciplinary care in an environment where the safety, dignity and comfort of each patient are paramount. in delivering patient care, new york…

Health
5
Mount Sinai Community Foundation

To improve the health of the community it serves by ensuring the availability of medical, surgical, and primary care physicians and advanced practice providers and high quality healthcare services.

6
Mitral Foundation

THE MITRAL FOUNDATION IS a supporting organization at Mount Sinai Hospital dedicated to advancing mitral valve repair and reconstructive techniques in children and young adults around the world.

Health
7
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
12
Mount Carmel Health Plan Inc

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel health plan is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beth Israel Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is BronxCare Health Systems. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $747,558,957 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAISouth Nassau Communities Hospital Inc — $125,000,000 · HealthSouth Nassau Communit…ST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER — $50,000,000 · HealthST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT H…BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER — $25,517,119 · HealthBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL C…THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $18,312,634 · HealthTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAM…+1 more — $1,000,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $171,234,213 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALT…MSMC REALTY CORPORATION — $1,405,902 · Community Improvement
Education$747,558,957Health$219,829,753Human Services$171,234,213Community Improvement$1,405,902

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $747,558,957 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $171,234,213 over 8y, 41% of budgetSouth Nassau Communities Hospital Inc — $125,000,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER — $50,000,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER — $25,517,119 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $18,312,634 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMSMC REALTY CORPORATION — $1,405,902 over 6y, 23% of budgetBronxCare Health Systems — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds South Nassau Communities Hospital Inc
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH
  • Who funds MSMC REALTY CORPORATION
  • Who funds BronxCare Health Systems

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mount Sinai Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph