Loading…
· Private foundation
THE MOSES M AND HANNAH L MALKIN
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$375k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants
10
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 22 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$25,000
- THE HILLEL FOUNDATION$25,000
- UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JEWISH STUDIES$25,000
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
- SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$25,000
- BRIDGES MENTAL HEALTH$25,000
- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$25,000
- JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAVEN CT$25,000
- COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SOCIAL WORK SCHOOL$25,000
- THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$25,000
- URBAN COLLEGE OF BOSTON$15,000
- MERCY CORPS$10,000
- BEREA COLLEGE$10,000
- DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
- SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$10,000
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Pacific Union College
Seventh-day adventist college providing christ-centered education.
Education
2
Union College
Union college is a private liberal arts college affiliated with the united methodist church
Education
3
Union College
Offer a college experience including education, housing, & associated programs in lincoln, ne.
Education
4
Sarah Lawrence College
Sarah lawrence college is a four-year liberal arts college (continued on schedule o) offering select graduate programs on its main campus in bronxville, ny and 4 undergraduate global studies programs.
Education
5
The Southwestern College
The southwestern college is a private, not-for-profit college serving traditional age-students and adult learners with undergraduate and graduate degree programs.
Education
6
Benedict College
Benedict college will be a power for good in society. the college is a full opportunity college with high quality programs of teaching, research, and public service. these programs provide the students and community with knowledge, skills,…
Education
7
Siena College
Siena college is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…
Education
8
Centre College
Centre college is an educational community dedicated to study in the liberal arts as a means to develop the intellectual, personal, and moral potential of its students.
Education
9
Philadelphia University
To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.
Education
10
Birmingham-Southern College
Birmingham-southern college prepares men and women for lives of significance. the college fosters intellectual and personal development through excellence in teaching and scholarship and by challenging students to engage their community…
—
11
United Hospital Center Inc
To enhance the health status of the citizens of North Central West Virginia by providing a full range of services for inpatient and outpatient care.
Health
12
Central College
Central college is a private liberal arts institution dedicated to the four year undergraduate experience.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caridad Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berea College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$270,000Education$50,000Crime & Legal$25,000Human Services$10,000International$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE MOSES M AND HANNAH L MALKIN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 237059731 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin?
Find your warmest path to The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines