Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Milton & Lillian Diener Foundat Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$196kInternational$86kHealth$85kPhilanthropy$34kHuman Services$11kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,260
Median grant
2
States reached
$904k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LARGER THAN LIFE USA$25,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$20,000
MAGEN DAVID SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION$5,260
YOUNG ISRAEL OF POTOMAC RABBINIC FU$1,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LARGER THAN LIFE USA: $25k → 13%LARGER THAN LIFE USA: $25k → 13%LARGER THAN LIFE USA: $25k → 13%LARGER THAN LIFE USA: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 8 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +211% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$409k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+211%
+14%

Still filing today

25%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID SEPHARDIC CON
    5× · 2017–2021 · $148k
  • LT
    LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +69%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $76k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI DEFENSE
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINGATE INST
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • CE
    CHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID SEPHARDIC CON: $148,074 · OtherMAGEN DAVID SEPHARDIC CONFIDF: $34,100 · OtherFIDFMAGEN DAVID SC SISTERHOOD: $28,210 · OtherMAGEN DAVID SC SISTERHOODIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI DEFENSE: $10,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINGATE INST: $10,500 · OtherMAGEN DAVID SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION: $9,285 · Other+3 more: $10,000 · OtherLARGER THAN LIFE USA INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesLARGER THAN LIFE USA I…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $75,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRA…+1 more: $250 · InternationalCHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$271,669Human Services$85,000International$75,750Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLARGER THAN LIFE USA INC: $85,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $75,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Milton & Lillian Diener Foundat Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Milton & Lillian Diener Foundat Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milton & Lillian Diener Foundat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph