Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Connecticut · Private foundation

The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc

FUND MEDICAL RESEARCH RELATING TO PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS, INCLUDING DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA ("DIPGS") PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS. TO ESTABLISH THE WORLD'S LEADING NEURO-ONCOLOGY TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH LAB. Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's…

$95k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$25,00010%
MOM'S HOUSE INC of JOHNSTOWN$25,00018%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($45k), not named here.

Compare The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc with peer funders

About The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc

How much does The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc give?
The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc reported 4 grants totaling $95,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (26%), Human Services (26%), Religion (26%).
Who are The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ($25k), MOM'S HOUSE INC of JOHNSTOWN ($25k).
Does The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc based?
The Mikey Czech Foundation Inc is based in CT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mikey Czech’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home