Skip to content
The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research

Saving lives by funding cutting-edge research and by raising awareness of prostate cancer.

$550k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.6M
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai$100,000
The Regents of The University of California Los Angeles$100,000
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$50,000
Duke University$50,000
Indiana University$50,000
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center$50,000
The University of Iowa$50,000
Stanford University$50,000
University of Maryland Baltimore$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Stanford University: $50k → 14%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $100k → 17%Baylor College of Medicine: $50k → 16%University of Miami: $50k → 15%The University of Iowa: $50k → 15%Auburn University Foundation: $50k → 15%Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $50k → 9%Tulane Education: $50k → 23%The Regents of The University of California Los Angeles: $100k → 14%University of Texas MD Anderson: $50k → 16%University of Texas MD Anderson: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
IA
CA
MD
NC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 4 repeat orgs$600k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+48%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $550k · revenue +83%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $200k · revenue +44%
  • HL
    H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +83%
  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Duke University; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC: $550,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION…H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITU…Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $50,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterDUKE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SIN…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUniversity of Miami: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $50,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUC…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONUTMD ANDERSON: $150,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAIndiana University School of Medicine: $50,000 · OtherIndiana University School o…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLL…Sarah Injac MD: $50,000 · OtherSarah Injac MD
Health$700,000Education$550,000Other$400,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC: $550,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home