Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$51kPublic Benefit$36kArts & Culture$32kHousing & Shelter$20kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$19kHuman Services$8kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,400
Median grant
12
States reached
$390k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Maltz Theatre$3,600
Planned Parenthood$2,500
Greater Cleveland Food Bank$2,500
Voteorg$2,200
HFLA of Northeastern Ohio$1,600
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Dermatology Foundation$1,500
Heifer Project$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,400
KIPP Team & Family$1,400
Coalition for the Homeless$1,400
City Harvest$1,400
City Meals on Wheels$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jewish Board: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 39 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
9

Total granted

$280k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+74%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +80%
  • DF
    DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +12%
  • THE DOE FUND INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +453%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +74%
  • JS
    J STREET
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
2
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
5
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
6
Common Cause

With offices in washington d.c. and 25 states and 1.5 million supporters and activists, common cause works to advance democracy reforms at federal, state, and local levels, through drafting model legislation, lobbying, public engagement,…

—
7
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
8
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
9
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
10
Open Imagery Network Inc

Empowering organizations and individuals globally with open ml and eo data, standards and tools to address the world's most critical international development challenges.

Science & Tech
11
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groundwork Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Musical Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood: $24,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodMaltz Theatre: $13,600 · OtherMaltz TheatreCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $13,150 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATIONWHEN WE ALL VOTE: $11,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,400 · OtherHeifer Project: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherTanzanian Child's Fund: $8,000 · OtherSave a Child Heart Fd: $8,000 · OtherUH Arts Council: $8,000 · Other+27 more: $72,700 · Other+27 moreVOTEORG: $14,400 · Civil RightsVOTEORGUS VOTE FOUNDATION INC: $12,300 · Civil RightsUS VOTE FO…CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $9,700 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $7,150 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $8,500 · InternationalGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 · InternationalJ STREET: $1,800 · InternationalTHE DOE FUND INC: $9,750 · Housing & ShelterCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $7,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association: $2,650 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$215,800Civil Rights$26,700Food & Nutrition$19,850International$12,800Housing & Shelter$9,750Arts & Culture$9,650Crime & Legal$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOTEORG: $14,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $13,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUS VOTE FOUNDATION INC: $12,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHEN WE ALL VOTE: $11,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $9,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $9,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $7,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $2,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUNDWORK USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDEASTREAM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOTEORG ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds US VOTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHEN WE ALL VOTE ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph